that's great. Felix SCR generator has the big advantage over bnd that it is just little tool for one purpose and is for that reason easier to integrate in existing build environments.
Daniel On May 18, 2012 4:59 PM, "Carsten Ziegeler" <[email protected]> wrote: > 2012/5/17 Felix Meschberger <[email protected]>: > > Hi > > > > Am 17.05.2012 um 01:51 schrieb David Jencks: > > > >> I thought I'd seen a message on a similar topic but can't find it right > now. > > > > Me too ;-) > > > >> > >> DS 1.2 introduces annotations that work a bit differently from the > felix DS annotations. Furthermore it looks like the (unreleased) current > bnd code handles generating the xml from them, with possible overrides from > an instruction/"header" in a .bnd file. > > > > Or the bundle plugin configuration. > > > >> > >> I've suggested a patch that extends the felix annotations to expose the > new policy-option. > > > > Thanks. Got it and testing it right now. > > > >> > >> Is there any point in extending the felix scr plugin to handle the > "official" DS annotations since bnd already deals with them? I'd guess > no.... I do think we should check how well the bnd support works through > maven. > > > > We have been discussing it. I am ... undecided. On the one hand, we > already have an easily accessible implementation of those annotations (we > should verify whether the bundle plugin way really works). On the other > hand, I see the plugin to be a one-stop shop for DS annotations. > > > > Currently I am slightly inclined to be in favor to add support to the > plugin... > > Actually I'm currently working on a rewrite of our scr plugin and then > adding the new ds annotations once the osgi jars are available in a > public maven repo. > > Carsten > > > > > > Regards > > Felix > > > >> > >> thanks > >> david jencks > >> > > > > > > -- > Carsten Ziegeler > [email protected] >
