Hi, Am 29.08.2012 um 22:11 schrieb David Jencks:
> I think I understand the cause of the currently known concurrency problems > and hope to fix them in the next few days. If we don't see new problems for > a week or so I'd be very happy to go for a 1.8.0 release. I'm not so > thrilled about releasing the current code as it has an infrequent but major > concurrency problem and also has a bunch of logging not really suitable for > production to try to elucidate those concurrency problems. Fortunately the > logging finally worked :-) Understood. I would actually prefer to keep the additional logging in. We might degrade the level to DEBUG and even surround with "if (isDebugEnabled)" statements. > > I'm not sure how we could figure out an earlier version we'd like to release > without all the DS 1.2 and proposed 1.3 features. My goal is for DS 1.2 completeness first and have it released. As for the currently proposed extensions (RFP 151, http://www.osgi.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=147), I think we already have most of them (with the notable exception of the admin API which is slightly different than today's API). > > Are you aware of any DS 1.2 features we haven't implemented yet? I have not > yet figured out how to run the CTS, the packaging seems to have changed a bit > since the instructions were written. Ok, I will see, what is missing. And I can also run the CT. > > thanks! Also, thanks ;-) Regards Felix > david jencks > > > > On Aug 29, 2012, at 8:21 PM, Felix Meschberger wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I saw quite some activity again recently around DS. I wonder what the state >> currently is and whether we should head for an early release before going >> into another round of fixes. >> >> I could imagine, we'd do a 1.6.2 release instead of 1.8.0 and do the 1.8.0 >> release once we are complete with the implementation of the latest DS spec >> and the current concurrency issues. >> >> WDYT ? >> >> Regards >> Felix >
