[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3699?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13470935#comment-13470935
]
Clement Escoffier commented on FELIX-3699:
------------------------------------------
Hi,
Would it be acceptable in your use case to configure the manipulator with the
annotation ?
Something like:
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.felix</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-ipojo-plugin</artifactId>
<version>...</version>
<configuration>
<componentAnnotations>your.company.new.annotation,your.company.new.annotation2</componentAnnotations>
<!-- comma separated list -->
</configuration>
</plugin>
We can map all attributes of the annotation to iPOJO's element attributes.
> Allow annotations to handle custom component definitions.
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FELIX-3699
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3699
> Project: Felix
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: iPOJO
> Reporter: Issac Garcia
>
> Custom components are well handled in iPOJO using the metadata.xml, for
> example:
> <CustomComponent classname="MyClass" name="myCustomComponent">
> <requires field="service"/>
> </CustomComponent>
> The custom component definition will, for example, add handlers and so on. It
> works very well and is nice that iPOJO allows that kind of extensions.
> But we can't declare a custom component by using annotations, for example
> doing:
> @CustomComponent
> public class MyClass {...}
> It will be a nice if iPOJO allows to do it using annotations, since the same
> functionality must be possible with the metadata.mxl and with annotations.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
