On 2/11/13 09:14 , Sahoo wrote:
How does one know which are partially implemented vs. fully
implemented? Is it documented anywhere?
There was no attempt to implement any of the R5 API because I didn't
personally have the time to do it. This was just an attempt to move to
the R5 API to make it easier for people to submit patches for R5
functionality.
Luckily, there isn't much new for the framework to implement in R5, but
no where have we claimed that 4.2.0 is an R5 framework. It still passes
the R4.3 CT (except for signature tests) and it hasn't been run on the
R5 CT.
-> richard
Thanks,
Sahoo
On Monday 11 February 2013 04:44 PM, Karl Pauls wrote:
We do use the R5 api and implement parts of it but I don't think we
are implementing all of it yet...
regards,
Karl
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 6:01 AM, Sahoo <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Does Felix 4.2.0 not include all of R5 core APIs? I am assuming it
also implements them. If so, why should it not be called an R5
framework?
Thanks,
Sahoo
--
Karl Pauls
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://twitter.com/karlpauls
http://www.linkedin.com/in/karlpauls
https://profiles.google.com/karlpauls
