[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13686598#comment-13686598
]
Clement Escoffier commented on FELIX-4138:
------------------------------------------
Shouldn't the declaration beeing notified of the factory disposal and be
unbound ?
> TypeDeclaration calls factory.dispose() even if it already has been disposed
> (externally)
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FELIX-4138
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4138
> Project: Felix
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: iPOJO
> Affects Versions: ipojo-runtime-1.10, ipojo-manipulator-1.10.1
> Reporter: Pierre Bourret
> Assignee: Guillaume Sauthier
> Fix For: ipojo-runtime-1.10.2
>
>
> In some tests, I manually destroy an iPOJO factory by calling
> IPojoFactory.dispose()
> However, on framweork shutdown, the associated type declaration tries to call
> the same method again, without checking the factory actual state. It may also
> be possible that the TypeDeclaration is not unbound despite the fact the
> factory is not active anymore.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
