Hi David Makes sense to me.
Regards Felix Am 16.10.2013 um 09:32 schrieb David Jencks: > Hi, > > Several of the fundamental class names in DS no longer fit the purpose of the > classes and I'd like to rename them to be less misleading before the next > release. Since I don't always come up with comprehensible names I'm asking > for advice. Here's what I have so far: > > DelayedComponentManager is unnecessary, there is no code beyond > ImmediateComponentManager. > > Immediate[Delayed]ComponentManager --> SingleComponentManager (subclassed by > ServiceFactoryComponentManager). This handles immediate and delayed non > factory non service factory components, so there's only one component > instance per component manager. > > ImmediateComponentHolder --> ConfigurableComponentHolder (as opposed to > ComponentFactoryImpl, which is both a ComponentHolder and ComponentManager). > This deals with components from a non-factory component metadata and accepts > possible configuration from config admin (via the ConfigurationSupport class). > > thoughts? > > many thanks > david jencks
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
