On 31/01/14 11:50, David Bosschaert wrote:
On 31 January 2014 10:46, Ferry Huberts <[email protected]> wrote:
On 31/01/14 11:38, David Bosschaert wrote:
On 31 January 2014 10:28, Ferry Huberts <[email protected]> wrote:
So you're going to provide an R5 index, derived from OBR?
If you're talking about an R5-compliant xml, no I wasn't planning on
providing that, but I am planning to extend the Felix OBR runtime so
that its able to read it. I think to provide the R5-compliant
So you're going to provide an OBR index derived from an R5 index?
Seems kind of pointless to me, since the OBR format is considered
'deprecated'.
No not quite - I'm planning to provide an OSGi Respository Service
implementation (OSGi Enterprise Spec chapter 132) in the Felix OBR
subproject. It should be able to read both the proprietary Felix OBR
xml as well as the spec-compliant repository xml and will provide an
instance of the OSGi Repository Service in the service registry...
ah ok, sorry for the confusion :-)
repository.xml people will probably want to use
https://github.com/osgi/bindex
That repo is kind of at a stand-still.
Nowadays bindex is developed at https://github.com/bndtools/bindex
Oh yes, sorry wrong URL...
David
--
Ferry Huberts
