Hi Ray, PojoSR is not services injection framework, it's a container much like an OSGi Framework with the classloading bits left out ;) You should be able to run DS/Blueprint on top of it, but the pure modularity on the classloading level is gone.
It can be quite useful for people who like to use OSGi Services or migrate to OSGi for other reasons, but don't want to handle the modularity on the classloader level just yet. Well, that's my understanding anyway ;) Cheers, David On 6 March 2014 13:49, Raymond Auge <raymond.a...@liferay.com> wrote: > Sorry for my ignorance, but I have to ask! > > Can PojoSR be used 'within' osgi runtime as a peer to DS, Blueprint? > > I had previously assumed no, but a conversation with a colleague has me > doubting that. > > - Ray > On Mar 6, 2014 2:52 AM, "Peter Kriens" <peter.kri...@aqute.biz> wrote: > >> Great name!!! >> >> Wonderful idea, it is still one of the least recognized jewels in the >> toolbox to move to OSGi. >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Peter Kriens >> >> On 5 mrt. 2014, at 13:43, Karl Pauls <karlpa...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Hi Chetan, >> > >> > im more than willing to have PojoSR move to Felix - provided you (or >> > somebody else) is willing to do the legwork. I guess we'll have to funnel >> > it through the incubator ip clearance, rename the packages, and cut a >> > release. If somebody volunteers to drive this then lets do it (and yes, >> I'm >> > looking at you, Clement :-). >> > >> > Perspectively, it would be nice to really integrate it with the >> framework >> > - i.e., we should make it so that it gets the parts it needs from the >> > framework either directly from the framework subproject or factor out the >> > service registry and have framework and PojoSR depend on it. However, for >> > starters, just renaming what is there and worry about something like this >> > later is fine too. >> > >> > Btw., if so, we should maybe rename it - I'm pretty sure nobody is going >> to >> > complain if we call it Apache Felix Connect :-). >> > >> > regards, >> > >> > Karl >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Chetan Mehrotra < >> chetan.mehro...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> <<Apologies for cross posting but as the subject is of common interest >> >> to both group sending it to both groups>> >> >> >> >> In Apache Jackrabbit Oak [1] we have inbuilt support for OSGi based >> >> deployments. To reuse the logic for non OSGi env I was investigating >> >> [2] PojoSR [3] and it looks pretty useful and most of the stuff works >> >> out of the box without requiring any change. >> >> >> >> Wanted to check if there were any thoughts on moving this project to >> >> Apache Felix >> >> >> >> Chetan Mehrotra >> >> [1] http://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/ >> >> [2] http://jackrabbit-oak.markmail.org/thread/7zpux64mj6vecwzf >> >> [3] https://code.google.com/p/pojosr/ >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Sie erhalten diese Nachricht, weil Sie Mitglied der Google Groups-Gruppe >> > "pojosr-discuss" sind. >> >> Um Ihr Abonnement für diese Gruppe zu beenden und keine E-Mails mehr von >> > dieser Gruppe zu erhalten, senden Sie eine E-Mail an >> > pojosr-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> >> Weitere Optionen: https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Karl Pauls >> > karlpa...@gmail.com >> > http://twitter.com/karlpauls >> > http://www.linkedin.com/in/karlpauls >> > https://profiles.google.com/karlpauls >> >>
