[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2706?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Pierre De Rop resolved FELIX-2706.
----------------------------------
    Resolution: Fixed

Committed a simple patch for issue in revision 1632835.
Added a testcase in [1]
Also added a sample code in [2]

[1] 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/felix/sandbox/pderop/dependencymanager-prototype/org.apache.felix.dependencymanager.itest/src/org/apache/felix/dm/itest/ConfigurationDependencyTest.java

[2] 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/felix/sandbox/pderop/dependencymanager-prototype/org.apache.felix.dependencymanager.samples/src/org/apache/felix/dependencymanager/samples/compositefactory/

> Support callback delegation for Configuration Dependecies
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FELIX-2706
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2706
>             Project: Felix
>          Issue Type: Wish
>          Components: Dependency Manager
>            Reporter: Bram de Kruijff
>            Assignee: Pierre De Rop
>             Fix For: dependencymanager-4.0.0
>
>
> At the moment it is possible to add a (by definition required) 
> ConfigurationDependency to a Component. DM manages the ManagedService 
> registration and relaxes the contraint of having to implement the interface 
> on your component implementation class, but you do still have to implement 
> the updated(Dictionary dict) callback on it as it is not possible to delegate 
> this to a callback handler. I would like to be able to have a way to delegate 
> this to a callback handler for two main reasons:
> 1) Remove the requirement for implementing the updated(Dictionary dict) 
> signiature in my business logic. I consider dealing with this delivery 
> mechanism OSGi plumbing that should not be part of my business logic.
> 2) Allow a factory object to recieve the configuration before the actual 
> factory method is invoked. This allows the factory to instantiate and 
> configure the eventual service implementation instance based on configuration 
> data.
> For more detail see the thread on the user list : 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg09015.html



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to