[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4716?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14232726#comment-14232726
]
Clement Escoffier edited comment on FELIX-4716 at 12/3/14 7:49 AM:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh I see.
So, first making these packages optional is not really satisfying, for two
reasons:
1. Providers (bundle exporting these packages) may come and go, and the
optional resolution does not support such dynamism
2. The impact of not having these packages is quite huge. I agree that an
initial detection would be enough, but if I want to be more dynamic, that's not
that simple
One possibility would be to package a _bare_ version of iPOJO core. This
version would not contain _org.osgi.services.*_ packages (just import them).
WDYT ?
was (Author: clement.escoffier):
Oh I see.
So, first making these packages optional is not really satisfying, for two
reasons:
1. Providers (bundle exporting these packages) may come and go, and the
optional resolution does not support such dynamism
2. The impact of not having these packages is quite huge. I agree that an
initial detection would be enough, but if I want to be more dynamic, that's not
that simple
One possibility would be to package a _bare_ version of iPOJO core. This
version would not contain _org.osgi.services.*_ packages (just import them).
> Bundle org.apache.felix.ipojo physically contains OSGi API classes
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FELIX-4716
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4716
> Project: Felix
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: iPOJO
> Affects Versions: ipojo-runtime-1.12.0
> Environment: ubuntu 14, karaf
> Reporter: Karl Leopold
>
> The _org.apache.felix.ipojo_ bundle imports, exports and physically contains
> interface-classes of packages _org.osgi.services.cm_ and
> _org.osgi.services.log_, both with version 1.3.
> I'm running ipojo in karaf 3.0.2. There, these osgi-packages also exists,
> just in another version.
> Sometimes it happens that a bundle of mine, which has a package-dependency on
> _org.osgi.services.cm_ is bound to the ipojo-version instead of the one of
> felix/karaf. Now, the bundle is resolved, but the service dependency on the
> ConfigurationAdmin can never be resolved, because the implementation is
> incompatible to the imported interface.
> I can fix that, if I play around with the bundle start levels.
> Anyway, I think it's a bug in iPOJO, because it should not inline any OSGi
> API packages.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
