[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Clement Escoffier closed FELIX-4565. ------------------------------------ > Occasional ArrayIndexOutOfBoundException in iPOJO's ProvidedServiceHandler > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: FELIX-4565 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4565 > Project: Felix > Issue Type: Bug > Components: iPOJO > Affects Versions: ipojo-runtime-1.11.2 > Environment: Karaf 2.3.3 / Windows 7 64 bit > Reporter: Benjamin Debeerst > Assignee: Clement Escoffier > Fix For: ipojo-runtime-1.12.1 > > > I have an iPOJO (1.11.2) component using the @ServiceController annotation to > control the service publishing. Most of the time this works perfectly fine, > but occasionally I get an ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException. > {code} > java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 4 > at > org.apache.felix.ipojo.handlers.providedservice.ProvidedServiceHandler.__M_onSet(ProvidedServiceHandler.java:416)[83:org.apache.felix.ipojo:1.11.2] > at > org.apache.felix.ipojo.handlers.providedservice.ProvidedServiceHandler.onSet(ProvidedServiceHandler.java)[83:org.apache.felix.ipojo:1.11.2] > at > org.apache.felix.ipojo.InstanceManager.onSet(InstanceManager.java:1401)[83:org.apache.felix.ipojo:1.11.2] > [..] (My own code following, where the service controller > boolean is manipulated) > {code} > Unfortunately I cannot share the consumer code nor reproduce the problem. I > looked into [iPOJOs > code|http://grepcode.com/file/repo1.maven.org/maven2/org.apache.felix/org.apache.felix.ipojo/1.11.2/org/apache/felix/ipojo/handlers/providedservice/ProvidedServiceHandler.java#416] > to see what's going on, and there we have: > {code} > for (int j = 0; j < svc.getProperties().length; j++) { Property prop = > svc.getProperties()[j]; > [...] > } > {code} > Which looks like a proper race condition to me, if svc.getProperties() > changes its value in the meantime because of missing synchronizations. I > don't see any synchronizations there, but I also don't know if they would be > appropriate in the first place. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)