On Friday 30 October 2015 06:41:09 Benson Margulies wrote: > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 2:36 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <cziege...@apache.org> wrote: > > Am 30.10.15 um 01:48 schrieb Benson Margulies: > >> Is this a consensus to proceed yet? It's been a few days since the > >> last contribution. > > > > We clearly have different opinions, they range from "why change?", > > "let's get moving" to "let's do more than a simple conversion". > > I don't see a clear consensus/agreement on any of the three. For each > > opinion there are imho good/valid arguments. I have the feeling that a > > formal vote does not lead us anywhere. > > > > Maybe someone can clearly identify/list the benefits for everyone if we > > move from svn to a single git repo - compared to using the already > > existing git proxy. I think this should give everyone a clear view of > > why the migration makes sense. And if there are no compelling reasons > > then we have a decision as well. > > I think I can state some advantages: > > > 1: Make it significantly easier to apply patches from people who > provide them via github. > > 2: Make it significantly easier to create branches in the main repo > for collaborative changes. > > 3: Take a first step towards subdividing into multiple repos where > that makes sense.
some more: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-3987 https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SLING/Move+from+Subversion+to+Git Is there already a project at Apache which moved from Subversion to Git setting up multiple repos or even a repo per release artifact? Regards, O. > My sense of the email thread is that we have some enthusiastic > supporters of moving to git, and some '+0' weak objectors. So, in some > models of consensus process, that would be a reason to go ahead. Do > you want to recast this as a VOTE as a way of clarifying views? > > > Carsten > > -- > > Carsten Ziegeler > > Adobe Research Switzerland > > cziege...@apache.org
