This thread has again quiesced. I respectfully submit that it's time
for a PMC member to start a [VOTE] thread to see whether there is a
decision to proceed.


On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Benson Margulies <ben...@basistech.com> wrote:
> Greeting, Marcel,
>
> It's not my intention to try to talk anyone into changing how they
> release anything. For the things that are built with Maven, it's my
> preference to avoid exercising the maven-release-plugin's feature of
> handling multiple released items in a repo, but it's just a
> preference. If the acceptable compromise is to have less repos than
> releasable items (possibly as few as one repo), I'd personally rather
> do that than not move to git at all.
>
> regards,
>
> benson
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Marcel Offermans
> <marcel.offerm...@luminis.nl> wrote:
>> On 24 October 2015 at 11:36:03, Benson Margulies 
>> (ben...@basistech.com(mailto:ben...@basistech.com)) wrote:
>>
>>> > So I would definitely argue against getting a Git repository per bundle.
>>> > Per subproject sounds like the right granularity to me.
>>>
>>> If a subproject is released all at once, then we're completely
>>> agreeing. If not, then your preference means exercising the
>>> occasionally squishy part of the release plugin; maybe it will get
>>> fixed once and for all.
>>
>> So for the dependency manager we reasoned as follows:
>>
>> 1) When talking about releases within Apache, we are talking about source 
>> code. Releasing that a subproject at a time makes sense to me as the code, 
>> even if it ends up in different bundles, clearly belongs together.
>>
>> 2) Binary releases are a matter of convenience and “what is convenient” 
>> depends a lot on where you’re coming from. A lot of people would argue that 
>> putting a binary in Maven is convenient, but there are definitely other 
>> options. The binary releases also don’t have to have a 1:1 mapping with the 
>> source, so we can have N bundles being put in Maven and other repositories 
>> all from the same source release.
>>
>> Greetings, Marcel
>>
>>

Reply via email to