Is there an Embed-Dependency analog? On Nov 9, 2015 12:07 PM, "Konrad Windszus" <[email protected]> wrote:
> The biggest difference is that currently the bnd-maven-plugin does not > support instructions within pom files ( > https://github.com/bndtools/bnd/issues/952) but rather only in dedicated > bnd files. > Therefore for existing users of maven-bundle-plugin it is not so easy to > migrate. > Konrad > > > > On 09 Nov 2015, at 16:48, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi Christian, > > > > it sounds promising, but maybe a bit early to have a strong opinion. > > > > From a technology standpoint, it's good to converge. > > > > However, we talk about two different community there, and maybe license. > > As a tooling, it's not a big deal. > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > On 11/09/2015 11:02 AM, Christian Schneider wrote: > >> I recently looked into the bnd-maven-plugin from paremus. It features a > >> better maven lifecycle integration than the felix one. > >> So for example you do not need the packaging "bundle" anymore which is a > >> big obstacle for some projects. > >> It also will probably be part of the maven support for bdntools. > >> > >> So I wonder what the plans for the felix maven plugin are. Will we > >> follow that path and also provide a similar version? > >> Should we at some point recommend to users to switch? > >> > >> Christian > >> > > > > -- > > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > > [email protected] > > http://blog.nanthrax.net > > Talend - http://www.talend.com > >
