[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5200?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Pierre De Rop closed FELIX-5200.
--------------------------------

> Factory configuration adapter not restarted
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FELIX-5200
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5200
>             Project: Felix
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Dependency Manager
>    Affects Versions: org.apache.felix.dependencymanager-r1
>            Reporter: Pierre De Rop
>            Assignee: Pierre De Rop
>             Fix For: org.apache.felix.dependencymanager-r8
>
>
> When a factory pid adapter is losing one of its required service 
> dependencies, it is stopped, but when the lost dependency comes up again, the 
> configuration adapter instance is not re-created and re-started.
> Example:
>  * A factory configuration adapter has a required dependency on a "Required" 
> service.
>  * The factory configuration is created, the "Required" service is 
> registered, so a factory configuration adapter INSTANCE1 is then created.
>  * Now the "Required" service is unregistered: the INSTANCE1 is then stopped.
>  * And when the "Required" service comes up again, then a new factory config 
> adapter INSTANCE2 should be re-created, updated and started, But since R1 
> this is not the case anymore.
> The bug is located in the AbstractDecorator.stop() method, this method 
> currently does this:
> {code}
>     public void stop() {
>         for (Component component : m_services.values()) {
>             m_manager.remove(component);
>         }
>     }    
> {code}
> Clearly, this is a bug because the "m_services" list is not cleared, so when 
> the AbstractDecorator.updated(String, Dictionary) method is called again, it 
> finds again some old stale components, and updates them instead of 
> re-creating new adapter instances.
> In DM3, the list was correctly cleared:
> {code}
>     public void stop() { 
>         Object[] components;
>         synchronized (m_services) {
>             components = m_services.values().toArray();
>             m_services.clear();
>         }
>         for (int i = 0; i < components.length; i++) {
>             m_manager.remove((Component) components[i]);
>         }
>     }    
> {code}
> I will add a test case soon.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to