+1

On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 5:42 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <[email protected]>
wrote:

> While I understand this, I don't see anyone working on this atm and wrt
> this issue the release under vote is not worse than 1.0.6. So let's go
> ahead with 1.0.8 and once someone is able to fix FELIX-5309 we simply do
> another release. Releases are cheap and easy
>
> Carsten
>
> > I really would like to have a fix for
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5309 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5309> included in this
> version as well.
> > Did someone already have a look at that?
> > If someone provides me with some feedback to my comments there I could
> also provide a PR with a fix.
> >> On 02 Aug 2016, at 10:43, Carsten Ziegeler <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> +1
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Carsten Ziegeler
> >> Adobe Research Switzerland
> >> [email protected]
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> --
> Carsten Ziegeler
> Adobe Research Switzerland
> [email protected]
>
>


-- 
*Raymond Augé* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile>
 (@rotty3000)
Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com>
 (@Liferay)
Board Member & EEG Co-Chair, OSGi Alliance <http://osgi.org> (@OSGiAlliance)

Reply via email to