Pierre De Rop created FELIX-5683:
------------------------------------

             Summary: getServiceProperties returns null instead of empty 
dictionary
                 Key: FELIX-5683
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5683
             Project: Felix
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: Dependency Manager
    Affects Versions: org.apache.felix.dependencymanager-r9
            Reporter: Pierre De Rop
            Assignee: Pierre De Rop
            Priority: Minor


There are two issues:

1)

In the felix users mailing list (see [1]), Bram reported the following:

when you set a component service properties like this:

{code}
Component component = 
 
m_dependencyManager.createComponent().setInterface(ApplicationService.class.getName(),new
 Properties());
  component.getServiceProperties().put("a", "b");
{code}

then you get a NPE because the component.getServiceProperties() method returns 
null instead of the empty dictionary that has been set in the 
setInterfaceMethod.

This is a regression made in r9 release, in the FELIX-5522 where a refactoring 
was done regarding aspect service properties.

A fix can be made in order to behave like before (that is : avoid the NPE). 

2)

Bram, I may be wrong but I think that one new issue is that the dictionary 
returned by the getServiceProperties() method was so far (since the initial 
version of felix dm 2.0.1) a copy of the service properties dictionary 
maintained in the ComponentImpl, so if you would like to do set service 
properties like this:

{code}
Component component = 
 
m_dependencyManager.createComponent().setInterface(ApplicationService.class.getName(),new
 Properties());
  component.getServiceProperties().put("a", "b");
  m_dependencyManager.add(component);  // won't add "a=b" properties
{code}

then the "a" property will be set in the copy of the internal dictionary 
returned by the getServiceProperties() method, and the "a=b" service properties 
won't be set when the component is added in the m_dependencyManager.

So, if what I'm saying is correct and if you would like to see this new 
behavior implemented, please open a new jira issue and I will manage to 
implement it; thanks

PS: I'm now fixing the 1) regression, in order to avoid the NPE.

[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/users%40felix.apache.org/msg17939.html



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to