Hm, not sure I like that name too much. It seems to be potentially
somewhat confusing.

How about:

org.apache.felix.log.logback

or maybe just:

org.apache.felix.logback

regards,

Karl

On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 12:43 AM, Raymond Auge <[email protected]> wrote:
> So far I've come up with what I believe is better:
>
> org.apache.felix.logbackend
>
> - Ray
>
> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 2:11 PM, Raymond Auge <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I'm going to start committing the osgi.to.logback module but I want to
>> make sure I have the right name since once it's sticks it will be for a
>> long time.
>>
>> Right now it's, well... osgi.to.logback
>>
>> _What it is_ is a bundle which:
>> - connects an OSGi Log Service (one which implements OSGi Log 1.4 spec) to
>> the logback backend
>> - provides a slf4j impl
>> - provides a robust and flexible backend (i.e. appenders)
>> - provides a bridge from logback's configuration to LoggerAdmin
>> - provides "framework hook" so that it can live on the classpath of the
>> framework for immediate logging
>>
>> Suggestions for names? I will wait until Tuesday before making a real
>> commit so that people have a chance to pipe in then I'll pull the trigger.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>> --
>> *Raymond Augé* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile>
>>  (@rotty3000)
>> Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com>
>>  (@Liferay)
>> Board Member & EEG Co-Chair, OSGi Alliance <http://osgi.org>
>> (@OSGiAlliance)
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Raymond Augé* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile>
>  (@rotty3000)
> Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com>
>  (@Liferay)
> Board Member & EEG Co-Chair, OSGi Alliance <http://osgi.org> (@OSGiAlliance)



-- 
Karl Pauls
[email protected]

Reply via email to