[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5925?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Konrad Windszus updated FELIX-5925:
-----------------------------------
Description:
It would be nice to also have a check in
https://github.com/apache/felix/tree/trunk/tools/osgicheck-maven-plugin for
packages with a dedicated version which do not explicitly state, whether they
are provider or consumer type. Although there is a default (ConsumerType) as
specified in
https://osgi.org/javadoc/osgi.annotation/7.0.0/org/osgi/annotation/versioning/ProviderType.html
it is reasonable to enforce a conscious decision (i.e. an explicit annotation)
for the following reasons:
- people tend to forget to think about this for new API/SPI
- the default used to be different with the same-named bnd annotation in the
past therefore relying on the default is very error prone
was:
It would be nice to also have a check for packages with a dedicated version
which do not explicitly state, whether they are provider or consumer type.
Although there is a default (ConsumerType) as specified in
https://osgi.org/javadoc/osgi.annotation/7.0.0/org/osgi/annotation/versioning/ProviderType.html
it is reasonable to enforce a conscious decision (i.e. an explicit annotation)
for the following reasons:
- people tend to forget to think about this for new API/SPI
- the default used to be different with the same-named bnd annotation in the
past therefore relying on the default is very error prone
> osgicheck-maven-plugin: Add check for packages with versions but without
> explicit provider/consumer type information
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FELIX-5925
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5925
> Project: Felix
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Utils
> Reporter: Konrad Windszus
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: osgicheck-maven-plugin 1.0.0
>
>
> It would be nice to also have a check in
> https://github.com/apache/felix/tree/trunk/tools/osgicheck-maven-plugin for
> packages with a dedicated version which do not explicitly state, whether they
> are provider or consumer type. Although there is a default (ConsumerType) as
> specified in
> https://osgi.org/javadoc/osgi.annotation/7.0.0/org/osgi/annotation/versioning/ProviderType.html
> it is reasonable to enforce a conscious decision (i.e. an explicit
> annotation) for the following reasons:
> - people tend to forget to think about this for new API/SPI
> - the default used to be different with the same-named bnd annotation in the
> past therefore relying on the default is very error prone
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
