[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6097?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16813130#comment-16813130
]
Georg Henzler commented on FELIX-6097:
--------------------------------------
Useful bash script to see check response codes during startup:
{code}
http_code=-1
last_http_code=-1
url=${1:-http://localhost:8080/}
for ((i=1;;i++));
do
timestamp=`date +%T.%3N`
outputFile="curl-$timestamp.out"
http_code=`curl -o $outputFile -f --max-time 2 --connect-timeout 2 -w
"%{http_code}" "$url" 2> error.log`
http_code=$((http_code))
if (( http_code != 500 )); then # keep 500 responses for analysis, delete
others
rm -f $outputFile
fi
logMsg="$timestamp $url response code: $http_code"
if (( http_code != last_http_code )); then
echo "$logMsg";
else
if ((i % 50 == 0 )); then
echo "$logMsg (still unchanged)";
fi
fi
last_http_code=$http_code
done
{code}
> Improve startup behaviour of ServiceUnavailableFilter for low start levels
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FELIX-6097
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6097
> Project: Felix
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Health Checks
> Affects Versions: healthcheck.core 2.0.2
> Reporter: Georg Henzler
> Assignee: Georg Henzler
> Priority: Major
>
> After some analysis and after comparing with the sling mechanism at [1], it
> turns out that if a filter is registered to the http whiteboard, it only
> becomes active if there is actually a servlet to answer the request
> (otherwise the filter will never kick in and the request just return 404).
> In a setup that uses a product that registers the http whiteboard at start
> level 5 and the product servlets at start level 20, the current version of
> ServiceUnavailableFilter only kicks in at start level 20 once the product
> servlets become active when it should really already return 503 during
> startup start levels 5-19. Although the 404 response code is usually treated
> equally by machine clients (load balancers, kubernetes probles) it is still
> not semantically correct, hence this shall be improved to use the mechanism
> of [1].
> [1]
> https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-starter-startup/blob/f9f9496588e335d7bdee0246abff5fb22051809f/src/main/java/org/apache/sling/starter/startup/impl/HttpStartupSetup.java#L61
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)