+1 Ray
On Sat, Nov 2, 2019, 09:09 Jean-Baptiste Onofré, <[email protected]> wrote: > It sounds like a plan ;) > > +1 > > Regards > JB > > On 02/11/2019 13:41, Christian Schneider wrote: > > I propose we first move the whole repo and then extract projects if > people > > like this. > > It is much easier to do the extraction based on a git project. > > > > Christian > > > > Am Sa., 2. Nov. 2019 um 13:21 Uhr schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré < > > [email protected]>: > > > >> +1 > >> > >> The question is: do we keep an unique repository for all felix projects > >> or we create one git repo per project. > >> > >> I would prefer to have one dedicated git repo per project > >> (felix-framework, felix-configadmin, etc). > >> > >> Regards > >> JB > >> > >> On 02/11/2019 10:06, Christian Schneider wrote: > >>> In the past we discussed a few times about moving felix to git. > >>> > >>> A while ago we did this step for Aries and it was simpler than > >> anticipated. > >>> The problem in Aries were the remaining small bundles and subprojects > >> that > >>> were released by bundle. The larger sub projects were already moved out > >> to > >>> separate git repos a while ago. > >>> > >>> So the situation was very similar to felix. In the end we opted for the > >>> simple solution of just migrating the full repo to git with the help of > >> the > >>> infra team. > >>> This works quite fine since then. So I propose we do the same for > felix. > >>> > >>> WDYT? > >>> > >>> Christian > >>> > >> > >> -- > >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré > >> [email protected] > >> http://blog.nanthrax.net > >> Talend - http://www.talend.com > >> > > > > > > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > [email protected] > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com >
