Hi Felix devs,
I'm using karaf 4.2.7 which include felix util 1.11.2
There is an interface org.osgi.resource.Capability with these methods
/**
* Compares this {@code Capability} to another {@code
Capability}.
*
* <p>
* This {@code Capability} is equal to another {@code
Capability} if they
* have the same namespace, directives and attributes
and are declared by
* the same resource.
*
* @param obj The object to compare against this {@code
Capability}.
* @return {@code true} if this {@code Capability} is
equal to the other
* object; {@code false} otherwise.
*/
boolean equals(Object obj);
/**
* Returns the hashCode of this {@code Capability}.
*
* @return The hashCode of this {@code Capability}.
*/
int hashCode();
And we also implement above interface via
org.apache.felix.utils.resource.CapabilityImpl but this class does not
implement equals() and hashCode().
This will be a problem when we have the same bundles expose the same
package org.apache.felix.utils.resource.CapabilitySet#addCapability
will add dupplicate capability.
E.g. I have a feature class named "my-feature" and this feature contains
<repository>mvn:org.apache.cxf.karaf/apache-cxf/${cxf.version}/xml/features</repository>
<feature name="my-feature">
<bundle>mvn:org.apache.cxf/cxf-core/${cxf.version}</bundle>
... my other bundles ...
</feature>
During startup time, felix resolve export-packages from cxf-core and found
that cxf-core packages are exposed by 2 bundles (first one from
cxf-core in repository and the other from my-feature).
{ResourceImpl@24398} "org.apache.cxf.cxf-core/3.3.4" ->{Subsystem@24381}
"root#my-feature"
{ResourceImpl@24423} "org.apache.cxf.cxf-core/3.3.4" ->{Subsystem@24414}
"root#cxf-core-3.3.4"
+ export packages from cxf-core in repository.
{CapabilityImpl@7156} "[org.apache.cxf.cxf-core/3.3.4]osgi.wiring.package;
version:Version=3.3.4;bundle-symbolic-name=org.apache.cxf.cxf-core;bundle-version:Version=3.3.4;osgi.wiring.package=org.apache.cxf.annotations"
->{RequirementImpl@8400} "[org.apache.cxf.cxf-core/3.3.4]
osgi.wiring.package;filter:="(osgi.wiring.package=org.apache.cxf.annotations)""
{CapabilityImpl@7157} "[org.apache.cxf.cxf-core/3.3.4]osgi.wiring.package;
version:Version=3.3.4;bundle-symbolic-name=org.apache.cxf.cxf-core;bundle-version:Version=3.3.4;
osgi.wiring.package=org.apache.cxf.attachment" ->{RequirementImpl@8401}
"[org.apache.cxf.cxf-core/3.3.4]
osgi.wiring.package;filter:="(osgi.wiring.package=org.apache.cxf.attachment)""
+ export packages from cxf-core in my-feature.
{CapabilityImpl@9196} "[org.apache.cxf.cxf-core/3.3.4] osgi.wiring.package;
version:Version=3.3.4;
bundle-symbolic-name=org.apache.cxf.cxf-core;bundle-version:Version=3.3.4;osgi.wiring.package=org.apache.cxf.annotations"
->{RequirementImpl@8142} "[org.apache.cxf.cxf-core/3.3.4]
osgi.wiring.package;filter:="(osgi.wiring.package=org.apache.cxf.annotations)""
{CapabilityImpl@9197} "[org.apache.cxf.cxf-core/3.3.4]osgi.wiring.package;
version:Version=3.3.4;bundle-symbolic-name=org.apache.cxf.cxf-core;bundle-version:Version=3.3.4;
osgi.wiring.package=org.apache.cxf.attachment" ->{RequirementImpl@8146}
"[org.apache.cxf.cxf-core/3.3.4]
osgi.wiring.package;filter:="(osgi.wiring.package=org.apache.cxf.attachment)""
Due to this, these export-package from cxf-core will be moved to
m_substPermutations in org.apache.felix.resolver.ResolverImpl via
org.apache.felix.resolver.ResolverImpl.ResolveSession#addPermutation.
And if m_substPermutations grow huge, this will be a performence issue as
each permutation keep ~ 1mb.
Class Name |
Shallow Heap | Retained Heap | Percentage
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
org.apache.felix.resolver.ResolverImpl$ResolveSession @ 0xef76ce00|
96 | 295,635,448 | 88.67%
|- java.util.LinkedList @ 0xf5fa02f8
| 32 | 295,621,952 | 88.67%
| |- java.util.LinkedList$Node @ 0xf51a6168 |
24 | 895,824 | 0.27%
| |- java.util.LinkedList$Node @ 0xf52a0ca0 |
24 | 895,824 | 0.27%
| |- java.util.LinkedList$Node @ 0xf53db7f8 |
24 | 895,824 | 0.27%
| |- java.util.LinkedList$Node @ 0xf5496320 |
24 | 895,824 | 0.27%
| |- java.util.LinkedList$Node @ 0xf55b0e58 |
24 | 895,824 | 0.27%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is there any reason why are we not implement equals() and hashCode() in
Capability?
I think if we implement these methods, the size of CapabilitySet can be
reduced because we don't add duplicate Capability.
Thanks,
Tuan.
--
Sent from:
http://apache-felix.18485.x6.nabble.com/Apache-Felix-Dev-f4846309.html
