I’ve:

- added a link to the KEYS file and validation instructions to the downloads 
page.
- updated the site-how-to and release-management-nexus pages to correspond to 
the Antora site.
- restored the components/bundle-plugin[-archives] documentation I deleted 
earlier.

The CMS system is going to be deactivated in a few days.  If there are no more 
comments I’m going to switch over to the new site on Wednesday July 28 (2 
days).  I think the new site is definitely in usable condition and we can deal 
with  any remaining problems as they appear.

David Jencks

> On Jul 21, 2021, at 4:57 PM, David Jencks <david.a.jen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Some questions from fixing these…
> 
> - Should the current core version be set as an attribute in  the playbook so 
> it is available on any page?  I put it in the apache-felix-framwork.adoc page 
> as
> 
> :framework-version: R8
> 
> but perhaps this would be more useful in the playbook.
> 
> - I don’t know that we have current TCK compliance results for the framework 
> or anything else…. do we?  On the apache-felix-framework-faq.adoc I changed 
> from an outdated and broken link to R4.2 to simply saying “Yes” to “is it 
> compliant?”.  This might be a place to use the version attribute, e.g. “is 
> the framework R8 compliant?".
> 
> And a couple of comments/questions below…
> 
> Thanks!
> David Jencks
> 
> 
>> On Jul 21, 2021, at 2:39 PM, Karl Pauls <karlpa...@gmail.com 
>> <mailto:karlpa...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi David,
>> 
>> thanks again for taking care of this. Looks very good overall. I
>> noticed some minor issues namely,
>> 
>> - In the top right corner (or the „hamburger“ menu in the mobile view)
>> we have „Projects“ which I think should rather be „Subprojects“ to be
>> consistent with the sidebar. That said, I’m not sure we need the
>> „hamburger“ menu/the top right corner short links at all as they are
>> in the sidebar anyways (but I don’t feel too strongly about it).
> fixed
>> - On the download page, the links for the framework distribution are
>> not correct. They need to target the distribution artifacts (i.e.,
>> org.apache.felix.main.distribution-7.0.0.tar.gz and
>> org.apache.felix.main.distribution-7.0.0.zip)
> I changed the (top) “framework distribution” section.  Is it correct for the 
> subprojects framework entry points to the framework jar and related 
> source-release artifacts?
>> 
>> - The framework page
>> (https://felix.staged.apache.org/documentation/subprojects/apache-felix-framework.html
>>  
>> <https://felix.staged.apache.org/documentation/subprojects/apache-felix-framework.html>)
>> has only a broken listing  „{% for label, page in children %}* link:{{
>> page.path }}[{{ page.headers.title }}] {% endfor %}“
> fixed
>> 
>> - In the framework FAQ
>> (/documentation/subprojects/apache-felix-framework/apache-felix-framework-faq.html)
>> there are some broken links.
> fixed
>> 
>> - The index page does say: „A list of javascript extracted news
>> excerpts:“ but there are no excerpts. If that is hard todo right now,
>> maybe we should just remove that notice?
>> 
> If we put the list of releases in a .yml or json5 file that would be 
> plausible, but I don’t think it adds much value.  I removed the placeholder.
>> - Ultimately, it would be very good to update the
>> https://felix.staged.apache.org/documentation/development/site-how-to.html 
>> <https://felix.staged.apache.org/documentation/development/site-how-to.html>
>> with the new way of working and update the bits about changing the
>> side on releases as well here:
>> https://felix.staged.apache.org/documentation/development/release-management-nexus.html#_update_the_site
> 
> Soon :-)
>> 
>> I think it would be good if we could get these fixed before the
>> switch. Otherwise, I think we are good to go - thanks a lot!
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Karl
>> 
>> On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 6:18 PM David Jencks <david.a.jen...@gmail.com 
>> <mailto:david.a.jen...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Thanks!, fixed.
>>> 
>>> David Jencks
>>> 
>>>> On Jul 21, 2021, at 1:04 AM, Александр Шаклеин <cheester...@gmail.com 
>>>> <mailto:cheester...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi all
>>>> Tutorials page starting with code block
>>>> 
>>>> ср, 21 июл. 2021 г., 10:01 David Jencks <david.a.jen...@gmail.com 
>>>> <mailto:david.a.jen...@gmail.com>>:
>>>> 
>>>>> I’ve updated the UI to fix the problems noted, and made the logo have a
>>>>> transparent background as Amit suggested.  For some reason Safari doesn’t
>>>>> seem to load the fixed logo, but it looks fine on Chrome and Firefox.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I need to do something about the changelog links on the download page, but
>>>>> it’s not any worse than the current download page where these links are 
>>>>> all
>>>>> broken.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Any other comments?  I think infra would appreciate us switching to the
>>>>> new site soon.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> David Jencks
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Jul 19, 2021, at 11:26 PM, David Jencks <david.a.jen...@gmail.com 
>>>>>> <mailto:david.a.jen...@gmail.com>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi Amit,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Great idea, and it looks like there are free tools to do that that even
>>>>> I will be able to figure out how to use!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> David
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Jul 19, 2021, at 10:57 PM, Amit Mondal <ad...@amitinside.com 
>>>>>>> <mailto:ad...@amitinside.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi David,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The new revamped website looks pretty awesome. I have one tiny
>>>>> proposal: we could make the Felix logo transparent so that it looks
>>>>> dissolved on the background.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>> Amit
>>>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>>>> From: David Jencks <david.a.jen...@gmail.com 
>>>>>>> <mailto:david.a.jen...@gmail.com>>
>>>>>>> Sent: 20 July 2021 02:25
>>>>>>> To: dev@felix.apache.org <mailto:dev@felix.apache.org> 
>>>>>>> <dev@felix.apache.org <mailto:dev@felix.apache.org>>
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Preview of new website?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I’ve set up a preview at https://felix.staged.apache.org/ 
>>>>>>> <https://felix.staged.apache.org/>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I think the content is in an acceptable if not ideal state to switch
>>>>> over from the CMS site.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The top bar of the UI needs some work:
>>>>>>> - feather looks weird
>>>>>>> - “apache felix” both in logo and text
>>>>>>> - links in drop-downs broken
>>>>>>> - downloads link broken.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I’d like to integrate the README-based subproject documentation (e.g.
>>>>> atomos, scr) better but I’ll discuss that in another email.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> David Jencks
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Jul 14, 2021, at 2:18 PM, Karl Pauls <karlpa...@gmail.com 
>>>>>>>> <mailto:karlpa...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Hi David,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> sounds like very good progress - thanks a lot for looking into this!
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I think a preview would be good if it is not too much work.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> regards,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 11:06 PM David Jencks <
>>>>> david.a.jen...@gmail.com <mailto:david.a.jen...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I hope to get the new Antora based website deployable in the next few
>>>>> days, the main task left is setting up an .htaccess file with redirects
>>>>> from the old page locations to the new.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Does anyone want to see a preview before I make the new site live, or
>>>>> shall we assume the best and fix any problems anyone notices?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>> David Jencks
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Karl Pauls
>>>>>>>> karlpa...@gmail.com <mailto:karlpa...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Karl Pauls
>> karlpa...@gmail.com <mailto:karlpa...@gmail.com>
> 

Reply via email to