I managed to build this branch but I had to comment away the integration test projects.
It seems like this pull request will never make it into iPojo since it is not being maintained anymore. Is that correct? If not, when you use it in production systems, do you create your own release of iPojo or do you simply use a snapshot version? /Bengt Den fre 24 nov. 2023 kl 12:44 skrev Bengt Rodehav <be...@rodehav.com>: > OK - thanks! > > /Bengt > > Den fre 24 nov. 2023 kl 11:57 skrev Александр Шаклеин < > cheester...@gmail.com>: > >> No. This one >> https://github.com/apache/felix-dev/pull/129 >> >> пт, 24 нояб. 2023 г. в 19:55, Bengt Rodehav <be...@rodehav.com>: >> >> > Is this the commit I should be using? >> > >> > >> > >> https://github.com/kwin/felix-dev/commit/93b773b29d41e625bdca52f200f8171824ad9ae9 >> > >> > /Bengt >> > >> > Den tors 23 nov. 2023 kl 21:08 skrev Bengt Rodehav <be...@rodehav.com>: >> > >> > > That sounds great! >> > > >> > > Is there a release that I can download? I would really like to try it. >> > > >> > > /Bengt >> > > >> > > On Thu, 23 Nov 2023, 18:37 Александр Шаклеин, <cheester...@gmail.com> >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > >> I have tested it with changes in suggested PR with jdk21. It works >> well. >> > >> >> > >> чт, 23 нояб. 2023 г., 19:08 Bengt Rodehav <be...@rodehav.com>: >> > >> >> > >> > I am revisiting this issue. Looking to start using iPojo in Karaf >> > 4.4.4 >> > >> > which supports JDK20. Did anyone create (and release) a new >> version of >> > >> > iPojo that works with JDK20? As I understood it, it was mainly >> about >> > >> using >> > >> > new version of ASM. >> > >> > >> > >> > /Bengt >> > >> > >> > >> > Den tis 22 mars 2022 kl 17:31 skrev Bengt Rodehav < >> be...@rodehav.com >> > >: >> > >> > >> > >> > > Not sure how or by whom a new release of iPojo could be created. >> > Does >> > >> > > anyone know? >> > >> > > >> > >> > > /Bengt >> > >> > > >> > >> > > Den tis 15 mars 2022 kl 17:25 skrev Bengt Rodehav (Jira) < >> > >> > j...@apache.org >> > >> > > >: >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> [ >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> > >> >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6502?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17507040#comment-17507040 >> > >> > >> ] >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> Bengt Rodehav commented on FELIX-6502: >> > >> > >> -------------------------------------- >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> I have done some testing regarding this fix and after updating >> to >> > Asm >> > >> > 9.2 >> > >> > >> iPojo now works with OpenJDK 17. I would really like for a new >> > >> release >> > >> > of >> > >> > >> iPojo including this fix to be made. >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> > IPOJO Java 11+ support >> > >> > >> > ---------------------- >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Key: FELIX-6502 >> > >> > >> > URL: >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6502 >> > >> > >> > Project: Felix >> > >> > >> > Issue Type: Improvement >> > >> > >> > Components: iPOJO >> > >> > >> > Reporter: Alexander Shaklein >> > >> > >> > Priority: Minor >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > I have made some changes in ipojo projects to work in java >> 11+. >> > >> > >> > The were successfully tested on java 11, 16. Should i make a >> PR >> > or >> > >> i >> > >> > >> can work with fork alone? >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> -- >> > >> > >> This message was sent by Atlassian Jira >> > >> > >> (v8.20.1#820001) >> > >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >
