Thank you Myrle for clarifying. With the constraints mentioned, I believe
it is good to go with option 2.

Regards,
Nazeer

On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Myrle Krantz <[email protected]> wrote:

> > With option 2) how are we going to prepare a release for 1 or 2 micro
> > services?
>
> Very good question Nazeer,
>
> These are my thoughts:
>
> We need to decide how to version our source release, our binary
> releases, and we need to decide how to enter that versioning into Jira
> for the "fixed version(s)".
>
> Our approach will have to work within the following constraints:
> * We still want to do heartbeat releases.
> * We're using semantic versioning (1) for our build artifacts.  In
> order to get continuous integration to work, we'll need to place
> versioned build-snapshots in an artifactory such as maven.
> * We have multiple build artifacts, and their versioning will not be
> synchronized.
> * But we'd like to have one Jira project for all 33 build artifacts.
> In Jira, releases belong to a project and not to a component.
> * We also don't want to release each build artifact individually; we
> want to create a complete release so that our users don't have to
> figure out which versions work together.
> * Releases are source code, but a binary artifact release in maven
> would make it easiest to use our stuff.  These would have to use the
> semantic versioning of our build artifacts.
> * Jira only has one workflow per ticket.  Not one workflow per release
> per ticket.  That is, if the status is "in review" for one of the
> releases, it's "In review" for all of them, even if the actual fix
> hasn't been checked in on another branch.
> * We may wish to create bugfix releases to an already created heartbeat
> release.
>
> I suggest the following approach:
> * Create Jira releases for the source code release simply by date:
> fineract.2018.02, fineract.2018.04, fineract.2018.06, etc.
> * Postfix the release if a bugfix release is necessary:
> fineract.2018.02.r2.
> * Create jira releases in Jira for each maven artifact as well:
> portfolio.1.0.0, portfolio.1.1.0, deposit.1.0.0, deposit 2.0.0, etc.
> * Add an upcoming fixed version to a ticket only after it's done-done
> for that version.  That means developed, tested, and merged.  Create a
> new Jira field "Targeted version" for the purpose of communication.
>
> Do you believe this is a workable approach? Did I miss anything?
>
> Best Regards,
> Myrle
>

Reply via email to