Hey James, As you've noted, Fineract CN already has it's own area. Fineract 1.x is doing a bit more manspreading, but given that it was there first, that's understandable. If Fineract CN content has strayed, that's also normal when volunteers contribute things without fully understanding the structure. I could only find one such article though, and that was in the user zone. I don't have any objections to you wrangling that one.
As I see it, top-level entries should be: * Committer's Zone * Contributor's Zone * Project Management * Release Management * 1.x * CN * Requirements That's nearly what we already have. Best Regards, Myrle On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 8:48 PM James Dailey <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all - > > I believe a decision was taken to have both Fineract and the new > Fineract-CN on the same confluence pages and on the same listserv. Unless > we can get a new Fineract-CN namespace on the apache confluence > established, this means that we will have pages showing up in various > places for Fineract-CN and discussions on this list also covering both code > bases. > > My first suggestion - after watching the email traffic for a few months - > is to include in emails and the documentation pages a tag of either > [Fineract-1.x] or [Fineract-CN]. This may be best in the header or merely > somewhere in the top of the message so that it is searchable. This is > already occurring in the ticketing on jira, right? > > My second suggestion is to restructure the pages on > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FINERACT. I think we > should create a structure where Fineract-1.x and Fineract-CN are top level > entries and then all of the content follows as children of those. I'd be > happy to try to work on that. It means almost everything must be moved one > level deeper, but I think that will help given that this is a rather large > architectural departure. That said, I know there are a few things that are > shared at the top, i.e. > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FINERACT/Committer%27s+Zone and > much of Contributor Zone. > > If we don't do this, then I believe we need to tag pages carefully and to > have notes saying "this is Fineract-1.x or Fineract-CN" throughout. Right > now we have Fineract-CN entries showing up in various places on the pages > and I suspect more will come as we develop that further. To anticipate - > yes, most of the content is under the page > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FINERACT/Fineract+CN but not > all, and in any case, having this be a secondary level where everything > else is Fineract-1.x is confusing. > > Lastly, I do believe we should try to have the authoritative fineract and > fineract-CN documentation be sufficient and complete, and therefore a place > where others will link to. > > Thanks, > James
