+1 nice improvement over the initial design. Cheers
Markus On Sun, Jan 20, 2019, 10:12 Daniel Gruno <[email protected] wrote: > Thanks for this, James! > > Over at ComDev, I think we are going to chance this and assume that the > new version has lazy consensus - that is, we're going to print it, and > well, if it doesn't get consensus, then we'll just make a fancy sticker > wall somewhere :D. > > I've put the proposed logos into the logo database as well (this can be > reverted at any time, this was primarily because the DB aids in offering > different asset formats), so that you can pick the rendered objects for the > web site repo if/when you wish to update that - you can find the new > assets, in both the light and dark version (and with or without the text) > at: > http://www.apache.org/logos/#fineract > > I find that the dark version (versions 2+3 on the logo site) works best > for your web site currently, whereas the light version is better for > stickers and such. > > Hope this helps, and thanks for championing the consensus! > > With regards, > Daniel. > > On 2019/01/19 15:13:45, James Dailey <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Daniel - > > > > Thanks for sharing. It's a decent update to the logo in my view. > > > > I know that Myrle was at the last FOSDEM conference last year in > Brussels. > > I don't myself know if fineract will be represented. For the good of the > > list, https://fosdem.org/2019/ is an open source conference, volunteer > > run. I hope we're going to be represented and am glad you have > stickers!! > > ;) > > > > The current logo is visible http://fineract.apache.org/ (attached) > > and the proposed one is here https://i.imgur.com/1w9X0Cb.png. (66kb) > > > > Our process here is to have a member propose a change and, by > > lazy-consensus, if no one has a significant objection, we can adopt that > > change. A logo change is useful if it enhances our image in public forums > > (fora?) like FOSDEM. The downside is all of the existing materials we > > have... uhm... printed?...as far as I know that's not an issue. > > > > So, I propose fineract adopt the new logo. If approved, I'll upload the > > changed logo to the git repos in the appropriate places. +1 from me. > > > > Any objections, comment, additional backers? > > > > Thanks, > > @jdailey67 > > > > > > [image: image.png] > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 1:05 AM Daniel Gruno <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > Hi, awesome Fineract people. > > > > > > I was looking through the FOSDEM sticker orders, and thus the Fineract > > > logo, and I was wondering if you as a project were willing to get the > > > logo touched up a bit before then? > > > > > > My proposed touch-up can be found at https://i.imgur.com/1w9X0Cb.png, > > > and if you would like to use this, I can get the original SVG uploaded > > > to our central database and hopefully it will make it to FOSDEM in time > > > :). And if you prefer to stick with the original logo, that's also > > > totally cool - just throwing this to you in case. > > > > > > Whatever the outcome, if you could please let me and/or Sharan Foga > > > ([email protected]) know which one you prefer within a day or two, we > > > can get the stickers sorted. > > > > > > With regards, > > > Daniel. > > > > > >
