James, The tests are run by https://travis-ci.org and the pass/fail can be seen with each pull request (Ex : https://github.com/apache/fineract/pull/527). History is at https://travis-ci.org/apache/fineract .
Regards, Vishwas On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 2:15 PM James Dailey <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Michael! +1 > > Is the infra tix already in or does it need to be requested? > > Once running is there a URL to check on pass/fail status? > > > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019, 2:40 PM Michael Vorburger <[email protected] wrote: > > > Hello everyone, > > > > On 2019/02/12 13:38:49, Ed Cable <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +1> > > > > > > Santosh, can you please update community on status of integration > tests?> > > > > > > Ed> > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019, 01:21 Myrle Krantz <[email protected] wrote:> > > > > > > > Hey all,> > > > >> > > > > Michael has suggested enabling Travis for the Fineract repo. What > > this> > > > > would do is automatically call the build on code submitted with a PR. > > We> > > > > could also configure it to automatically run integration tests (that > > will> > > > > only be useful if the integration tests are currently working). This > > will> > > > > make merging good PRs a little easier and rejecting PRs which break > > the> > > > > build a lot easier.> > > > >> > > > > This question is only for Fineract 1.x currently. Fineract CN will > > require> > > > > a bit more work to get CI support running because of the way it is > > spread> > > > > across multiple repositories.> > > > >> > > > > What do you think? If there are no objections in the next 72 hours, > > I'd> > > > > like to give Infra the go-ahead.> > > > >> > > > > Best Regards,> > > > > Myrle> > > > > FYI this is now fully done; hope this small contribution helps this > > community to be a little more effective. > > > > Please see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-697 for the > full > > details of the work that was required and done for this to work. > > > > All the best, > > M. > > > > PS: I'm not actually reading this list (and won't, just due to general > > load), but am replying to this via web interface; please Reply-To-All if > > you want me to see replies. > > >
