Can we give any authenticated apache jira user contributor status?

On Tue, Jul 9, 2019, 08:05 Michael Vorburger <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 11:02 PM Mohit Sinha <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> I can't see the 'Assign to me' link. It's uneditable.
>>
>
> Mohit, could you retry now? (If it doesn't work immediately, you may have
> to logout and login back to the Apache JIRA.)
>
> I've just added you as a Contributor (not Committer) via "Add user to a
> role" on
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/project-config/FINERACT/roles
> (available to some of us who have JIRA administration roles).  The details
> are explained on
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/Role+Based+JIRA+Authorization
> .
>
> I've noticed that we have only 7 contributors listed in the JIRA
> Administration. As far as I am concerned, we should grant the Contributor
> (not Committer) role much more liberally - I see very little "risk" in
> letting more people Edit or Assign or Link Issues.   I'm happy to add
> anyone else who replies to this with "me too please" as a Contributor.
>
>
>
>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 12:42 AM Awasum Yannick <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Mohit,
>>>
>>> Fineract uses Git branches to host versions on github:
>>> Fineract 1.2 has been released:
>>> https://github.com/apache/fineract/tree/1.2.0
>>> Fineract 1.3 and 1.3.1 planned for upcoming release:
>>> https://github.com/apache/fineract/tree/1.3.1
>>>
>>> Next version of Fineract 1.x will be 1.4 , this is what you need to use
>>> for new issues.
>>>
>>> Also add more details/description to ur issues.
>>>
>>> I also see the link "Assign to me", Click on that and the issue should
>>> be assigned to you:
>>> [image: image.png]
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 6:00 PM Mohit Sinha <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey,
>>>> I am not a committer in Apache Fineract, just an individual contributor.
>>>> I have created some JIRA issues because they were big changes and
>>>> needed to be properly documented.
>>>> I noticed that I couldn't assign them to myself.
>>>>
>>>> https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-767
>>>> https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-759
>>>>
>>>> I haven't resolved them, because it asks for some fields like affect
>>>> versions etc, about which I have no idea.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Mohit
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 10:35 PM Santosh Math <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Robert,
>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 7:58 PM Ippez Robert <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I would like to join on the team of QA. Please consider me as part of
>>>>>> the team
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> Ippez Robert
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 3:58 PM Santosh Math <
>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Myrle,
>>>>>>> Sure. I will help others to do QA.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 6:18 PM Myrle Krantz <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hey Santosh,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We can adjust the workflow in Jira to reflect the need for QA.
>>>>>>>> It's not necessary to assign to one specific person for QA, and it 
>>>>>>>> might
>>>>>>>> discourage others from joining in on that very important task.  A truck
>>>>>>>> factor of 1 is a bad thing for any project.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Santosh, would you be willing to help others learn to do QA as
>>>>>>>> well?  Would the rest of y'all like me to edit our Jira workflow to 
>>>>>>>> make
>>>>>>>> the QA step an explicit part of it?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>> Myrle
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 2:20 PM Santosh Math <
>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Awasum,
>>>>>>>>> Whenever ticket is raised , it's assigned to developer/coder first
>>>>>>>>> so that he can get notification to work on it. Once it's 'Resolved' , 
>>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>>> the same ticket is assigned QA so that QA person get notification 
>>>>>>>>> that he
>>>>>>>>> can start QA on that. After QA , if the ticket is not properly 
>>>>>>>>> resolved ,
>>>>>>>>> then QA person will assign it back to developer with comments. If it 
>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>> resolved, the QA person will close the ticket.
>>>>>>>>> Assigning a ticket is part of the workflow . There is nothing to
>>>>>>>>> do with taking credit or not.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 3:54 PM Awasum Yannick <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Santosh,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Assigning an issue to you which has been fixed by another person
>>>>>>>>>> is not a good idea. People want to take credit for their work. From 
>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>> information we can know who to invite as committer and it be part of 
>>>>>>>>>> their
>>>>>>>>>> CV(just record).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Anyways, We do it via Github PRs. Should be a simpler way to
>>>>>>>>>> search and assign the right person who completed a task.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 5:04 AM Santosh Math <
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Awasum,
>>>>>>>>>>> If the issues are fixed/resolved , those tickets should be
>>>>>>>>>>> assigned to me. You can simply use filter . Go to Issues > Search 
>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>> Issues . In next page , Select project as 'Apache Fineract' and 
>>>>>>>>>>> select
>>>>>>>>>>> status , tick only 'Resolved'. It would list all the tickets which 
>>>>>>>>>>> are in
>>>>>>>>>>> resolved status.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 3:07 AM Awasum Yannick <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I wonder if we could make the process of assigning an issue to
>>>>>>>>>>>> someone other than yourself on Fineract JIRA?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> There are cases where issues have been fixed in the past and we
>>>>>>>>>>>> need to assign that to the right person when closing these 
>>>>>>>>>>>> issues...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Does anyone have an idea on what to do to make it easy to
>>>>>>>>>>>> search and assign anyone on Issues?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I noticed this a few times..
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>> Awasum
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks & Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Santosh Math
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> *QA Engineer*
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> *Conflux Technologies Pvt Ltd
>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.confluxtechnologies.com/>*
>>>>>>>>>>> | *Office*: +91-080-41208662 |
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> *Address*: #304, 2nd Floor, 7th Main Road, HRBR Layout 1st
>>>>>>>>>>> Block, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560043 INDIA
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Thanks & Regards
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Santosh Math
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *QA Engineer*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *Conflux Technologies Pvt Ltd
>>>>>>>>> <http://www.confluxtechnologies.com/>*
>>>>>>>>> | *Office*: +91-080-41208662 |
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *Address*: #304, 2nd Floor, 7th Main Road, HRBR Layout 1st Block,
>>>>>>>>> Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560043 INDIA
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Thanks & Regards
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Santosh Math
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *QA Engineer*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *Conflux Technologies Pvt Ltd <http://www.confluxtechnologies.com/>*
>>>>>>> | *Office*: +91-080-41208662 |
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *Address*: #304, 2nd Floor, 7th Main Road, HRBR Layout 1st Block,
>>>>>>> Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560043 INDIA
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Ippez Roberts
>>>>>> Founder/C.E.O - Swift3 Technologies (U) Ltd
>>>>>> "Redefining Next Generation I/O Systems"
>>>>>> P.O.Box 155, Moyo
>>>>>> UGANDA.
>>>>>> Tel: +256777421862/775686538
>>>>>> Skype ID: ippez.robert1
>>>>>> Email: [email protected]
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Thanks & Regards
>>>>>
>>>>> Santosh Math
>>>>>
>>>>> *QA Engineer*
>>>>>
>>>>> *Conflux Technologies Pvt Ltd <http://www.confluxtechnologies.com/>*
>>>>> | *Office*: +91-080-41208662 |
>>>>>
>>>>> *Address*: #304, 2nd Floor, 7th Main Road, HRBR Layout 1st Block,
>>>>> Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560043 INDIA
>>>>>
>>>>

Reply via email to