All communications are about fineract-CN, not fineract 1.X. I have upgraded the dependencies of spring boot and spring, but facing some issues with new cassandra driver.
The updated code is in jupitermoney fork in update branch. To start with my initial requirement, we actually want to facilitate 2 factor authentication, thus we are thinking of bringing in cognito as the authentication provider, where end to end authorization is through jwt. Do you have any idea's about what would be a good starting point? Regards Rohit On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 3:38 AM Awasum Yannick <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Rohit, > > Are you talking wrt Fineract 1.x or Fineract CN. There are two projects > withing Apache Fineract. Mike, it seems Rohit is talking about Fineract CN. > > I think it will be great to upgrade Spring Boot and Spring versions for > Fineract CN before looking into any of the points discussed above. Maybe > start with upgrading to gradle 5 ot 6. > > > Thanks > Awasum > > > > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 8:46 PM Michael Vorburger <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On Tue, 14 Jan 2020, 10:52 Rohit Verma, <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Mike, >>> >>> Actually we already have a way to build java project based on distroless >>> based on distroless and within our fineract forks we are using that only, >>> at this stage its just a matter of pull request. >>> >> >> Oh, if you've already done it, then yes by all means do send a PR - >> looking forward to reviewing it! >> >> Usually for all the forks setting up ci/cd is very essential and the way >>> travis-ci limiting the free build minutes even on public projects, it >>> creates challenges for the fork. >>> >> >> We haven't had any capacity issues with the current CI set-up for >> http://GitHub.com/apache/fineract, but if we do, we could certainly look >> at alternatives. >> >> With github-ci we have abstracted the fork specific logic to github >>> secrets, so every fork can be used to push and deploy resources in >>> different repos and on PR there won't be a diff. >>> >>> Again I understand this is very low priority since we are talking about >>> big framework level changes. This probably would be coming through some >>> interns by the way :) >>> >>> Regards >>> Rohit >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 2:59 PM Michael Vorburger <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello Rohit, >>>> >>>> Welcome to the Apache Fineract community! >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 9:26 AM Rohit Verma >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Team, >>>>> >>>>> We are building over fineract a banking product. There are few things >>>>> which we want to discuss and get opinions from the experience developers. >>>>> >>>>> 1. Opinion on integrating with service-mesh functionalities, We are >>>>> looking forward to integrate, spring-cloud-kubernetes-istio to handle >>>>> discovery, config etc as well as to expose metrics. >>>>> >>>>> 2. Wondering if aunbis can be replaced with jwt based >>>>> authentication/authorization in conjunction of authentication adapter like >>>>> aws-cognito or auth0 or okta etc. This will reduce the usage of >>>>> permissible >>>>> feign client, simplify local demos. >>>>> >>>>> 3. A faster containerization process leveraging github actions and >>>>> buildx cache >>>>> >>>> >>>> you probably already saw that we currently use TravisCI for building, >>>> including validating the container build, and then Docker Hub Builds for >>>> actually producing the container in that registry. While I'm sure like >>>> anything that process could be further optimized, "it works" as is, so I'm >>>> not sure it's "worth it" to spend time on that, compared to other things >>>> which would add value. Like why would we? Just to shave a few minutes off >>>> the build times? Who cares, given so many other things which you could do >>>> that would add real value. I don't want to (and cannot ;-) stop you from >>>> innovating on this front, but that probably would be a very low priority, >>>> for me. Providing you this feedback only because you asked for it! :-) >>>> >>>> BTW GitHub actions *are* cool - FYI >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-829 >>>> >>>> >>>>> with more hardened base image like distroless. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Now THAT is entirely different - contributions on this front would be >>>> very very welcome! >>>> >>>> I've written up some thoughts about this on >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-830 - would you like to >>>> contribute that? >>>> >>>> 4. Building/integrating an opinionated risk assessment workflow during >>>>> loan creation process. >>>>> >>>>> Please let me know your thoughts on this. Any other unrelated >>>>> recommendations are also highly appreciated. >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> Rohit >>>>> >>>> >>>> We look forward to your contributions. >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> M. >>>> _______________________ >>>> Michael Vorburger >>>> http://www.vorburger.ch >>>> >>>> >>>
