We have developed an open source tool based on our instance of Jira we host where we create issues there and have a jira bot which does all the job from the maintainer point of view.
One perspective of the bid is developer would price the task with its own conditions that could lower potentially lower price and subside the quality. We have implemented multiple funding on single task and multiple payouts based on the work done ie easy to determine by a project maintainer. Once a pr is raised on the git it will watch the activities and then we can simply pay the user once it's done. At one point we will integrate Smart Contract functionality which does escrow and automatic payout too. Let me know if we can integrate this with jira and git. Thanks On Sun, 24 May 2020, 02:04 James Dailey, <[email protected]> wrote: > My starting point was this flow: > > Detailing an Issue (link to Jira) --> Asking for Bids --> Confirming Work > Order > --> PR and/or hot fix --> Acceptance and Payment. > > I've been on an internet hunt for on-demand solutions. I've also wondered > if there is a way to tightly integrate with Atlassian (jira). > > I could not find a suitable solution in their marketplace or core > software: https://www.atlassian.com/teams/software > > On the other hand, https://issuehunt.io. seems exactly along the right > path. > > Shall we proceed? > > On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 3:14 PM Ed Cable <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Michael, thanks for bringing this up. It's something that James had >> expressed a need for and something Mifos should and will explore more >> closely. >> >> Here's what James articulated as the need: >> >> >> 1. Someone comes to fineract or mifos list serve and wants /needs a >> specific feature. >> 2. They are told to input the feature into an online form (and maybe >> also into the issue tracker) >> 3. A developer who is a member goes to the platform and puts in a bid >> in >> 4. The next developer who comes may undercut that price >> 5. Reverse auction approach >> >> I will look more closely at Issuehunt and have an intern that's working >> on community development, Rachit Gupta, one of our GCI winners, explore >> some options. >> >> We could potentially use some of the Github Sponsors features - Mifos is >> now a part of the program, having moved off the wait list. >> >> https://github.blog/2019-05-23-announcing-github-sponsors-a-new-way-to-contribute-to-open-source/ >> >> On Discourse, we have also create a marketplace category for jobs and >> service requests which covers some of this but doesn't have the proper >> action mechanisms for this bidding/reverse auction. >> >> Ed >> >> >> On Sun, May 10, 2020, 13:09 Michael Vorburger <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On Sat, May 9, 2020 at 7:35 PM Michael Vorburger <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Airsay, >>>> >>>> If I were you, what I would do first to be able to contribute to >>>> driving your problem to an eventual resolution, is see if you can figure >>>> out if this is a problem in the "back-end" (so a bug in >>>> https://github.com/apache/fineract) or a display issue in the UI (so a >>>> bug in https://github.com/openMF/community-app). Once that's clear, I >>>> would try to create an easy way to reproduce this issue. Then create a bug >>>> in the respective project's issue tracker. Then you can see if there any >>>> volunteers willing to contribute a fix. Or perhaps one of the partners >>>> would want to step up and contribute a fix working for you. >>>> >>>> BTW Wouldn't it be cool if we used some sort of "tech support auction >>>> open marketplace" kind of site? What if Airsay, instead of posting his >>>> problem only here to our mailing lists, would create a bug in the >>>> appropriate issue tracker, and then be able to put a "bounty" on it - >>>> expressing "fixing this would be worth $N to me" (as in "currently", it >>>> would have to be possible to adjust it, in reaction to feedback..), to >>>> which interested parties and individuals (possibly even several!) could >>>> "bid" to mean "Heck yeah, I'd willing to contribute an upstream fix for >>>> this for $M!" (or maybe "not really sure what the problems is exactly and >>>> how to fix it, but.. for $X I would be willing to make some time to have a >>>> closer look for you, and then make you a quote"), out of which Airsay could >>>> pick one of the offers. The platform would be some sort of neutral middle >>>> man, and would have some sort of fancy game-ified reputation system... ;-) >>>> I've never seriously searched for anything like this, but I wouldn't be >>>> surprised if someone somewhere already thought of building a site like >>>> that... has anyone ever come across something like this? It's just a wild >>>> thought. >>>> >>> >>> FYI https://issuehunt.io seems to be something a bit like what I had >>> outlined here ^^^ .. I don't know anything more about it, but thought it >>> would be worth throwing in here - just in case someone else would like to >>> have a closer look at it, and see if this could be something of interest >>> for this community. Maybe not suitable - dunno. >>> >>> >>>> Best, >>>> M. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, 9 May 2020, 13:22 Airsay Longcon, <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Same under issue in Chrome, Edge, Chromium >>>>> >>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>> >>>>> On 9 May 2020, at 10:04, Samuel Joseph <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Try another browser >>>>> >>>>> Chrome >>>>> Opera, etc >>>>> >>>>> Safari or FireFox usually have that issue. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers. >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, 9 May 2020 at 10:02, airsay longcon <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I am running fineract (develop) on the following infrastructure >>>>>> Server: Windows 10 >>>>>> Tomcat: Tomcat 9.0.34 >>>>>> MySQL: MySQL 5.5.62 >>>>>> JDK: OpenJDK 11.0.7 >>>>>> Fineract: Fineract (develop) >>>>>> >>>>>> So I have been testing Fineract over the past four months with good >>>>>> success until last weekend. >>>>>> I have four products, two each under Recurring Deposit and Fixed >>>>>> Deposit. My preference would be Recurring Deposit but I can live with >>>>>> Fixed >>>>>> Deposit. >>>>>> After Properly Setting up products, I created a Client, created a >>>>>> back-dated recurring deposit account then calculated and posted interest. >>>>>> Prior to now interest posted (correct dates and amounts). However on >>>>>> Saturday May 01 (while still running on Tomcat 7 with JDK8) I noticed >>>>>> that >>>>>> Transaction Dates for Deposit and Interest displays null >>>>>> >>>>>> <image.png> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Product is correctly setup as below >>>>>> <image.png> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Notice in the screenshot above that Interest Rate Chart has a value >>>>>> for "Valid From Date". When I try to create an account however, I notice >>>>>> that it displays null as in the screenshot below >>>>>> <image.png> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The same thing holds for Fixed Deposit. Anyone faced this before? How >>>>>> can i resolve? >>>>>> >>>>>> Not that Under Transactions when I drill down I get a valid date >>>>>> entry as below >>>>>> <image.png> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Compare above screenshot for Transaction ID 2 with Transaction entry >>>>>> for same Transaction ID 2 >>>>>> <image.png> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Any help/advice will be appreciated. >>>>>> >>>>>> Warm Regards >>>>>> Airsay >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> [image: Logo] <https://www.fiter.io> >>>>> *Samuel C.S Joseph* >>>>> * Business/Projects.* >>>>> *e:* [email protected] >>>>> *w:* fiter.io <http://www.fiter.io> >>>>> *m:* +2348107176019 >>>>> [image: twitter icon] <https://twitter.com/Fiter_io> [image: youtube >>>>> icon] <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCfWztdFtHI3PwaSLAEcwTNQ> [image: >>>>> linkedin icon] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/fiter-io> >>>>> >>>>> Mifos-developer mailing list >> [email protected] >> Unsubscribe or change settings at: >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mifos-developer > >
