Hi Mike, I've been running through one of the test cases in the excel sheet you provided (RD TestCases) using the community app. I am recording and dumping what I am doing with mitmproxy <https://docs.mitmproxy.org/stable/concepts-howmitmproxyworks/> hoping that the requests can be replayed (or mutated to other forms like postman) in future. I am curious to know if there is an easy way of having a default base setup which has basic code values (e.g., gender, client type etc) and some clients. Are there any existing csv lists that can be imported, or mysql snapshots?
E.g., 1. Code values for `Gender` and `Client Type` are specified in the test case, but not defined by default. 2. Creating/activating clients Thank You, Julian Stephen On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 4:53 PM Julian Stephen <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for the information, everyone. Let me first try out the integration > tests. I will let know if I can submit a PR with postman scripts for at > least some tests. > > Julian > > > On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 11:28 AM Michael Vorburger <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Julian et al, >> >> ITs that Ram refers to are here, FYI: >> https://github.com/apache/fineract/tree/develop/fineract-provider/src/integrationTest/java/org/apache/fineract/integrationtests >> >> I have long felt that a set of Postman collections demonstrating >> Fineract's API's use could be very useful for the project to have... >> Basically something like >> https://github.com/mojaloop/postman for Fineract. >> >> If you, or anyone else reading this, has any interest in turning the >> documents Ed shared into something like that, I think that could be a great >> contribution to this project!! I'd be very happy to accept and merge PRs >> for something like that into a directory on >> https://github.com/apache/fineract. >> >> Best, >> M. >> >> >> On Sun, 21 Jun 2020, 17:18 Subramanya M K, <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Ed, >>> >>> Saw your mails today. >>> Thank you very much for including me for the functional testing part. >>> However, as I am tied up with hectic activities for next 5 to 6 weeks, I >>> am not sure, if I can provide justice to this testing. >>> So, request you to kindly excuse me for few weeks, till I could complete >>> my committed activities. Post that, I will definitely try to involve myself >>> for functional testing. >>> I am extremely sorry for not being able to get involved at this point in >>> time. >>> >>> Thanks and Regards, >>> Subbu >>> >>> On Sun 21 Jun, 2020, 19:38 Ed Cable, <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Julian, I uploaded some of the previous test cases that have been >>>> completed at >>>> https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=1T5MlVh0KWC6bQmqiZwEmoI73Q-0cuaxr >>>> >>>> Santosh and Subu, can you update on current status of these? >>>> >>>> Ed >>>> >>>> On Sun, Jun 21, 2020, 01:14 Rama Reddy <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Integration test package in fineract1.x covers most of the functional >>>>> and integration tests including accounting. >>>>> >>>>> thanks >>>>> Ram Reddy >>>>> On Saturday, June 20, 2020, 09:37:26 PM GMT+8, Julian Stephen < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>> I was wondering if there are (or someone could point me to) >>>>> functional tests for the Fineract APIs (not Fineract CN) that cover actual >>>>> workflows. E.g., a sequence of API calls that cover creation of a new loan >>>>> or a sequence that creates a new saving account and adds a transaction >>>>> entry that moves money from one account to another. >>>>> >>>>> I was looking for Postman style requests or QA style test cases, or >>>>> even selenium scripts from the front end. I found some broken links to an >>>>> older v1 mifos community app scripts, but they seem non functional. >>>>> >>>>> Any pointers would be appreciated. >>>>> >>>>> Thank You, >>>>> Julian Stephen >>>>> >>>>>
