Thanks for the reassurance Michael.

On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 09:16 Michael Vorburger <[email protected]> wrote:

> Independently confirming this - relax everyone! (As in, you can relax for
> Fineract. Don't relax for anything else you are responsible for - do check
> any other code you have, this security vulnerability is as bad they can
> get; the Internet is rightfully on fire about this.)
>
> https://spring.io/blog/2021/12/10/log4j2-vulnerability-and-spring-boot
> (which I found while working on
> https://github.com/vorburger/MariaDB4j/issues/509) has some related
> background; TL;DR: *"The log4j-to-slf4j and log4j-api jars that we
> include in spring-boot-starter-logging cannot be exploited on their own.
> Only applications using log4j-core and including user input in log messages
> are vulnerable."*
>
> Or, more technically:
>
> $ ./gradlew fineract-provider:dependencies | grep log4j
> |    |    |    +--- org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-to-slf4j:2.14.1
> |    |    |    |    \--- org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-api:2.14.1
> |    |    |    +--- org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-to-slf4j:2.14.1
> |    |    |    |    \--- org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-api:2.14.1
> |    |    |    +--- org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-to-slf4j:2.14.1
> |    |    |    |    \--- org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-api:2.14.1
> |    |    |    +--- org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-to-slf4j:2.14.1
> |    |    |    |    \--- org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-api:2.14.1
> |    |    |    +--- org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-to-slf4j:2.14.1
> |    |    |    |    \--- org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-api:2.14.1
> |    |    |    +--- org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-to-slf4j:2.14.1
> |    |    |    |    \--- org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-api:2.14.1
>
> $ ./gradlew fineract-provider:dependencies | grep log4j-core
> (nothing)
>
> Hope this helps everyone to sleep well... ;-)
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 10:28 AM AirsayLongCon <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello Aleks
>> Thank you for the clarification
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 11, 2021, 10:17 AM Aleksandar Vidakovic <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> ... we are using SLF4J to abstract all the different logging frameworks
>>> (Commons Logging, Log4J etc.). Under the hood logging in Fineract is done
>>> by Logback and not Log4j. The only Log4j dependencies we have are those
>>> that "redirect" the logging to Logback.
>>>
>>> Here's also a vulnerability report for that specific dependency
>>> ("org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-to-slf4j"):
>>>
>>> https://snyk.io/vuln/maven:org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-to-slf4j
>>>
>>> FYI
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Aleks
>>>
>>> On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 2:10 AM AirsayLongCon <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello community,
>>>> Are we are of the RCE reportedly affecting log4j
>>>>
>>>> If your organization uses the log4j library, you should upgrade
>>>> to log4j-2.1.50.rc2 immediately.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://www.huntress.com/blog/rapid-response-critical-rce-vulnerability-is-affecting-java
>>>>
>>>

Reply via email to