Hello Arnold,

- I am trying to show where to put the JMeter in the project structure, not
in a particular order.
- The integration suite test cases are listed anywhere or it creates a test
case report that can be viewed or exported for later review?
- JMeter is not for adding an extra layer/step during the build process,
but for being executed on demand.
- About flakiness ... I don't get the point? Can it be explained a little
bit more?
- Proposal of another folder in the Fineract project is to add the Jmeter
assets independently.

Regards

El mar, 16 ene 2024 a las 1:08, Arnold Galovics (<arn...@apache.org>)
escribió:

> Hi guys,
>
> Despite the fact that I like extra test coverage, let's slow down a little
> bit before rushing any integration.
>
> I'd have a couple of questions about these tests:
> - Victor, you're saying these tests should come before fineract-provider,
> so within the regular build process yet these are JMeter, performance
> related test cases. So what are the assertions in these? I'm a little
> confused about what these are.
> - Did we do any cross-check with our integration suite if these test cases
> are covered and we are not introducing duplication unnecessarily?
> - The build times are already slower than ever, did we evaluate how much
> increase these would mean?
> - How about flakyness on these tests?
> - I'm also interested in the general quality of the tests because
> maintainability on most of the existing integration test suite is difficult.
>
> Again, I'm not against any new test case/suite introduction, but let's
> clarify the benefits and the drawbacks.
>
> Thanks.
> Best,
> Arnold
>
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 6:44 AM VICTOR MANUEL ROMERO RODRIGUEZ <
> victor.rom...@fintecheando.mx> wrote:
>
>> Hello Anjil,
>>
>> Version 1.9.0 is tagged at:
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/fineract/tree/1.9.0
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Victor
>>
>> El lun, 15 ene 2024 a las 23:42, ANJIL CHINNAPATHLOLLA (<
>> anchi...@in.ibm.com>) escribió:
>>
>>> Thanks Victor / Mugabe,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I will verify the test suite against 1.9.0, make necessary minor changes
>>> wherever required and raise the PR.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks & Regards,
>>>
>>> Anjil ,
>>>
>>> Power Systems Performance
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From: *Magezi Arthur <artmag...@gmail.com>
>>> *Date: *Tuesday, 16 January 2024 at 3:35 AM
>>> *To: *dev@fineract.apache.org <dev@fineract.apache.org>
>>> *Subject: *[EXTERNAL] Re: API Test Case for Fineract
>>>
>>> Great proposal here. Anjil this would definitely be of great help.
>>> MUGABE MAGEZI ARTHUR Software Developer and Process Management Consultant
>>> emails: artmagezi@ gmail. com atmagezi@ yahoo. co. uk Mob:
>>> +256704901261 facebook: Magezi ArthurSkype: marthur26The
>>>
>>> Great proposal here. Anjil this would definitely be of great help.
>>>
>>> *MUGABE MAGEZI ARTHUR*
>>>
>>> Software Developer and
>>>
>>> Process Management Consultant
>>>
>>> emails:
>>>
>>> *artmag...@gmail.com* <artmag...@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> *atmag...@yahoo.co.uk <atmag...@yahoo.co.uk>*
>>>
>>> Mob: +256704901261
>>>
>>> facebook: Magezi Arthur
>>>
>>> Skype: marthur26
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The Struggle the doesn't break you will make you, if you hold a little
>>> longer under that fire you      will certainly come out as Gold
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 at 20:37, VICTOR MANUEL ROMERO RODRIGUEZ <
>>> victor.rom...@fintecheando.mx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Fineract Community,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> What do you think about integrating these tests on Apache Fineract. The
>>> Apache JMeter Tests can be included in this way:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Apache Fineract
>>>
>>> |
>>>
>>> ------Functional Test (Anjil contribution)
>>>
>>> |
>>>
>>> -----fineract-provider
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Do you have any comments about this proposal?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Victor Romero
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> El vie, 12 ene 2024 a las 15:06, VICTOR MANUEL ROMERO RODRIGUEZ (<
>>> victor.rom...@fintecheando.mx>) escribió:
>>>
>>> Hello Anjil,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I think it suits perfectly. Because it will help us to evaluate, verify,
>>> test the functionality between release. I.E. a possible 1.8.5 release and
>>> the 1.9.0.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> And this is important because with the results the community can be
>>> aware of the changes requiered on its applicatons.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I hope to listen (read) other community members opinion.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Victor
>>>
>>> El vie., 12 de enero de 2024 2:12 p. m., ANJIL CHINNAPATHLOLLA <
>>> anchi...@in.ibm.com> escribió:
>>>
>>> Hi Victor and community members,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I have a JMeter based test suite of Fineract (1.8.4) REST APIs put
>>> together for the performance evaluation of our Infrastructure. I have them
>>> classified into two categories
>>>
>>>    1. Setup Test suite – This contains set of APIs to setup a banking
>>>    environment, define products etc.
>>>    2. Transactions test suite – This contains various frequently run
>>>    account operations (Savings Deposits, withdrawals, balance enquiries, 
>>> loan
>>>    disbursal etc)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Posting below a screenshot of the test suits which can accommodate more
>>> test cases into respective groups as the need arises. The test suit serves
>>> the purpose of evaluating both functional as well as performance aspects of
>>> the use cases across the builds. If we think this helps with the purpose
>>> you are looking for below, I can contribute the test suits into the
>>> Fineract GitHub (With appropriate modifications to be consumable by the
>>> community).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Error! Filename not specified.*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks & Regards,
>>>
>>> Anjil ,
>>>
>>> Power Systems Performance
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> “Success is not the result of spontaneous combustion. You must set
>>> yourself on fire.”
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From: *VICTOR MANUEL ROMERO RODRIGUEZ <victor.rom...@fintecheando.mx>
>>> *Date: *Saturday, 13 January 2024 at 12:18 AM
>>> *To: *Dev <dev@fineract.apache.org>
>>> *Subject: *[EXTERNAL] API Test Case for Fineract
>>>
>>> Hello Fineract Community, I want to know if there is any Bundle of Test
>>> Cases for Apache Fineract API Rest that can be used to test the Apache
>>> Fineract vanilla version. - Create data codes (genders) - Create offices -
>>> Create delinquency bucket-
>>>
>>> Hello Fineract Community,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I want to know if there is any Bundle of Test Cases for Apache Fineract
>>> API Rest that can be used to test the Apache Fineract vanilla version.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> - Create data codes (genders)
>>>
>>> - Create offices
>>>
>>> - Create delinquency bucket
>>>
>>> - Create loan product
>>>
>>> - Create client
>>>
>>> - Create loan account (application, approval, disbursement)
>>>
>>> - Create repayments.
>>>
>>> - Etc
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I know that we have in the source code testing case (unit/integration
>>> test cases) that are executed as part of the building process, but this
>>> question is more related to a bundle/orchestration of  complete functional
>>> flows in order to make sure that the nightly build or the release has a
>>> functional quality check of its REST APIs.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Victor
>>>
>>>

Reply via email to