> we don't know if this specific MCP server concept will survive a year The AI landscape is advancing at lightning speed. However, the MCP protocol is the first to standardize LLM-tool interactions—and just a day ago OpenAI officially announced its adoption as well. Predicting where we'll be with all these in six months is a bold move, but right now, this seems like a very valid idea.
Kristof On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 3:37 PM James Dailey <jdai...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 for documenting the APIs properly and improvements to context mapping. > By context, I mean that the APis should have notations such that one can > see how they are to be used and what logic sits behind them. > > +0 (neutral) to adopting a specific vendor implementation - except as a > proof of concept. I think we don't know if this specific MCP server > concept will survive a year, and I'd want to be able to "cut away" from it. > i.e. I think we all know that building new dependencies on new tech can be > risky or if you are lucky, "brilliant in the rear view mirror". > > Victor - does this require or prefer a separate GitHub repo for the > "server"? Where would it sit in the project? > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 5:25 AM Kristof Jozsa <kristof.jo...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Victor, >> >> I'd be very interested to have a look at what you've done so far, or even >> help in - I wrote several MCP servers myself in the past month. I think >> having an up-to-date MCP server for Fineract could easily open new >> possibilities and new scenarios, and well worth our efforts.. >> >> Best, >> Kristof >> >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 9:02 PM VICTOR MANUEL ROMERO RODRIGUEZ < >> victor.rom...@fintecheando.mx> wrote: >> >>> Hello Apache Fineract Community, >>> >>> Question: >>> >>> Is there any interest in the Apache Fineract Community to integrate a >>> MCP Server ? >>> >>> There are other Apache Projects that are integrating this feature, i.e >>> Apache Doris. >>> >>> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/apache-doris-mcp-server-mingyu-chen-4k95c/ >>> >>> We have already made it por specific use cases like KCY and Loan >>> origination. >>> >>> But it could be useful if all the Apache Fineract APIs could be mapped. >>> >>> The MCP implementation tasks could be easier if we could have OpenApi >>> (swagger) updated and well documented and maybe this is the first step for >>> the MCP tool. >>> >>> I will be glad to hear your thoughts on this matter. >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Victor Romero >>> >>
