I just noticed that the values were already stored under a different name "processing_result_enum" so this migration is not needed, but we just need to fix the enum name. Adapted the PR. This migration and discussion is not relevant anymore.
On 2026/05/15 11:35:57 Hysnije Zllanoga wrote: > Hi Fineract community, > > My name is Hysnije, and I am a new contributor to Apache Fineract. > > I noticed that the r_enum_value table was missing status > values for command processing results, causing the > "/audits/searchtemplate" endpoint to return an incomplete list of > processing statuses. > > I opened JIRA issue FINERACT-2607 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-2607> and submitted PR > #5852 to fix this: > https://github.com/apache/fineract/pull/5852 > > A reviewer suggested I discuss this on the mailing list before > proceeding, since it involves changes to existing schema values. > I would appreciate any feedback or guidance from the community. > > Thank you! >
