Hi,

I believe the decision has been made: we will deprecate and remove this feature 
from the next release.

Anyone disagree with this?

Regards,
Adam Saghy

> On Jul 14, 2026, at 7:05 PM, James Dailey <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> +1 to deprecate 
> 
> +1 to external toolset and reporting 
> 
> Potentially +1 for the Arelle solution- seems perfect 
> 
> —-
> 
> Origin of the Mix XBRL was my initial work on outreach to World Bank CGAP 
> (when Mix market was part of that) with the concept being that Microfinance 
> Institutions needed a way to prove their Financial bono fides. 
> 
> Thus I think that the important point here is that the reporting 
> infrastructure needs to have sufficient fidelity and transparency.  
> 
> Ratio calculations are important to be defined within the project as long as 
> they tie to outside standards.  
> 
> Thanks 
> James 
> 
> 
> 
> Sent from Gmail Mobile
> 
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2026 at 7:09 AM Aleksandar Vidakovic 
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>  ... if we really need some sort of XBRL support then we should really 
>> consider integrating https://github.com/Arelle/Arelle... seems to be the 
>> gold standard in the open source world (note: it's implemented in Python)... 
>> if it's good for the SEC then it should be good for us?
>> 
>> Cheers
>> 
>> On Tue, Jul 14, 2026 at 3:52 PM VICTOR MANUEL ROMERO RODRIGUEZ 
>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> I think it should be deprecated and supported by a third party reporting 
>>> tool. In some cases the reporting are required to be generated using XBRL, 
>>> but they follow specific layout which I think it is not supported neither 
>>> implemented in Apache Fineract
>>> 
>>> El mar, 14 jul 2026 a las 7:09, Ádám Sághy (<[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>>) escribió:
>>>> Hi Dhroov,
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks for bringing this topic up for discussion.
>>>> 
>>>> I’m curious to know if anyone in the community is actively using this MIX 
>>>> XBRL module…otherwise we can consider deprecating it.
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Adam Saghy
>>>> 
>>>>> On Jul 14, 2026, at 2:08 PM, Dhroov Sankla <[email protected] 
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hello Fineract Developers,
>>>>> 
>>>>> While working on the serialization modernization for the MixReport module 
>>>>> (FINERACT-2670), we ran into architectural roadblocks stemming from 
>>>>> legacy dependencies. Specifically, the module still relies on 
>>>>> javax.script.ScriptEngine, which has been deprecated since Java 11 and 
>>>>> removed in subsequent releases.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Given that the MIX XBRL standard itself has long been abandoned globally 
>>>>> (https://themix.org <https://themix.org/>), maintainers Aleksandar 
>>>>> Vidakovic and Adam Saghy suggested on PR #6090 that we open a broader 
>>>>> discussion here.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Should we proceed with refactoring the existing serialization logic 
>>>>> natively, or is it more valuable to the project to deprecate and 
>>>>> completely remove the fineract-mix sub-module from the codebase to clean 
>>>>> up technical debt?
>>>>> 
>>>>> I would love to hear the community's thoughts on this.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Dhroov Sankla
>>>>> 
>>>> 

Reply via email to