Hi All, I have been looking around to understand their spirit of guidelines feel like sharing here.
https://lists.apache.org/thread/vo5zhnp1n7vmoz8d8lmqmnvptllhxj5r https://lists.apache.org/thread/4m7jcwb3w00wp0ojsvwvp53zhyczyf46 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-631 These are some public discussions within legal that also mirroring this discussion or vice versa. I am still looking for any existing CI checks or such that claims for scanning LLM generated code but not sure about their claims. Regards Aman On Wed, Sep 2, 2026 at 3:06 PM Aman Mittal <[email protected]> wrote: > One thing i want to point out if we were to consider using any third party > action it must be approved or whitelisted in > https://github.com/apache/infrastructure-actions repo. > > Regard's > Aman > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2026 at 4:56 AM VICTOR MANUEL ROMERO RODRIGUEZ < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello! >> >> It has been very nice to read the thoughts and opinions, and I have >> comments because I have not found anything in the ASF guidelines or related >> documents regarding the watermark that is being required under the AI Act’s >> Transparency Code. Different regulators around the world are increasingly >> mandating that such watermarks be embedded into AI-generated code. >> >> From my perspective, it is clear that because the ASF is a U.S.-based >> entity, it must comply with the laws, regulations, and policies of its host >> country. However, this raises an important question about code contributed >> from foreign jurisdictions and how such contributions should be handled in >> light of local regulations. >> >> I believe the guidelines, whether from the ASF or the Apache Fineract >> project, should explicitly address AI usage. These guidelines should also >> be treated as living documents rather than static ones, given how rapidly >> the AI landscape is evolving. Every user, contributor, reviewer, and >> adopter should be aware that different jurisdictions have varying >> approaches to AI generation and usage, particularly with respect to >> intellectual property, copyright, and transparency requirements. >> >> I would also be interested to know whether the ASF infrastructure team >> has any recommendations regarding GitHub Actions, tools, or other >> mechanisms that could help identify AI-generated code (especially in light >> of the emerging watermarking requirements), and a final thought... so then >> the Apache Fineract will have the ticket in this regulated jurisdiction >> "Apache Fineract contains AI generated code and can make mistakes. Please >> check the cited sources again" ? >> >> Regards, >> Victor Romero >> >> El mar, 1 sept 2026 a las 16:33, Adam Monsen (<[email protected]>) >> escribió: >> >>> James Dailey wrote: >>> >>>> https://rai.apache.org/ai-generated-code.html (again DRAFT) >>>> >>> >>> +1. This is excellent. >>> >>
