I think it makes sense to double the length of the four-letter short names used for financial products. I’m not entirely sure why the earlier restriction required exactly four letters, but I don’t see any downside to allowing longer names. ᐧ
On Thu, Sep 24, 2026 at 2:24 PM VICTOR MANUEL ROMERO RODRIGUEZ < [email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > Just to highlight to other Fineract users that there is an external_id and > it doesn't have such restrictions. > > Regards > > Victor > > El jue, 24 sept 2026 a las 6:15, Ádám Sághy (<[email protected]>) > escribió: > >> Hi >> >> I am considering whether we should keep four-letter short names for our >> financial products or extend the maximum length to allow more flexibility >> in naming within Fineract. >> >> *Story* >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-2854 >> >> *PR* >> https://github.com/apache/fineract/pull/6504 >> >> Please share your thoughts on this matter. >> >> Regards, >> Adam S >> >
