Why not command processing? I would argue that we should really make an effort to address even more of the technical debt (hint: new ticket in that category "type safe queries" FINERACT-2022)... and the new command processing is addressing a lot of it... I will circle back soon on the idempotency feature to get the most pressing thing out of the way. In general I'd say the whole discussion about next year's GSoC is a bit early, isn't it?
On Thu, Nov 5, 2026 at 2:29 PM Aman Mittal <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, Personally I recommend to not considering command framework for > upcoming gsoc unless any committer actually wants to mentor this. And some > ongoing PRs are still yet to merge. (It also affect the core fineract so we > will be very careful in this one) Any core fineract idea must have PMC > approval and dedicated committer as mentor. > > You can consider other fineract side projects. > > Regards > Aman > > > On Thu, 5 Nov, 2026, 6:22 pm Ádám Sághy, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi >> >> The real reason why the new command framework is not targeting these >> endpoints are the missing capabilities which are not addressed yet: >> >> - idempotency handling >> - maker-checker >> - etc >> >> >> Regards, >> Adam S >> >> On Nov 5, 2026, at 12:28 PM, Abhishek Chaudhary < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> While looking at Savings for GSoC 2027 ideas, I noticed that the 2026 >> GSoC page excluded the loan and savings packages from the >> command-processing project "to prevent interference with Pepper Soup >> efforts": >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/spaces/FINERACT/pages/421958555/GSOC+Summer+2026 >> >> While searching on "what pepper soup is" (I thaught it was a phrase), I >> stumbled on 2024 Mifos post ( >> https://mifos.org/blog/pepper-soup-enhancements/) and got to know Pepper >> Soup as sponsored upstream work focused mainly on loans, COB and >> performance. >> >> I had two questions: >> 1. Is that work still ongoing, and does its current scope include >> Savings, for example the Savings COB work in >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-2332? >> 2. Would stability work on Savings interest posting, such as tests and >> bug fixes, be open to a GSoC 2027 project, or should GSoC stay clear of >> that area? >> >> Thanks, >> Abhishek >> >> >>
