What about geo mapping ? which enables the latitude and longitude from google maps or some other service
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 2:41 PM Nikhil Pawar <nickr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello All, > > Please find the attached schema diagram of the proposed Address and > related configuration tables. > A quick description of the diagram: > Address table: > The fields of the address table would be configurable. The user can select > the field via field configuration table. > Rest of the fields are self explanatory. > > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Ankit Sharma <an...@theupscale.in> wrote: > >> Hi team, >> We have already made addresses - official, residential and permanent as a >> standard feature of CB. >> Looking forward on this. >> >> Ankit Sharma >> Upscale >> >> > On 30-Jun-2016, at 1:42 PM, Ashok <as...@confluxtechnologies.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > +1 >> > >> > It makes sense to have a standard address with minimal fields to >> support CB >> > or any other integrations and can be extended/configurable by >> organization. >> > >> > Thanks and Regards, >> > Ashok >> > >> > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Nayan Ambali <nayan.amb...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> Dayna, Markus, >> >> >> >> I feel, adding standard address to customer solves other problems too, >> >> example address can be made mandatory before activating client, >> address can >> >> be capture along with customer creation, Geo location based service on >> >> Android can built. >> >> >> >> i vote for adding client address as standard(out of box) feature. >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> Nayan Ambali >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks and Regards, >> >> Nayan Ambali >> >> +91 9591996042 >> >> skype: nayangambali >> >> >> >>> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 6:07 PM, <nikhilpa...@yahoo.in> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Hello Devs, >> >>> >> >>> While designing the credit bureau module, I came across few design >> >>> questions and I wanted community's opinion on that. >> >>> When you make a credit check query, the credit bureau expects you to >> send >> >>> the address along with few other identifiers. >> >>> >> >>> In order to fetch the address fields in a more hassle free and less >> error >> >>> prone way, I was thinking if we can standardize the address as core >> table. >> >>> By standardizing this address table, we may remove the need for >> defining >> >>> custom data table for storing addresses. >> >>> >> >>> Let me know your thoughts on this proposal of mine. >> >>> >> >>> Regards, >> >>> Nikhil >> >> >> > >
