Hi Adi,
Currently, I am using the url to save the original api invocation to the
{documentId}/command=approve.
I could make the change that you suggest, so it links to the document
download directly.
Anyway, the url is not shown in Mifos' maker-checker detail page... right?
Thanks
Lionel
2016-09-14 6:26 GMT-03:00 Adi Raju <adi.r...@confluxtechnologies.com>:
> Lionel,
>
>
>
> As part of MakerChecker query response, along with Entity Name, Action,
> even url is sent. Could we possibly use that to show the link to the
> document?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Adi
>
>
>
> From: Lionel Raymundi - Poincenot [mailto:lio...@poincenot.com]
> Sent: 03 September 2016 03:05
> To: dev@fineract.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Start work on FINERACT-209
>
>
>
> Hi again,
>
>
>
> So, finishing the day, I was able to:
>
> 1) Add to database and object model the flag "verified" which defaults to
> false
>
> 2) Build a POST method on "documents/{documentId}/command=approve" which
> switches the flag to true
>
> 3) Configure the post method built on 2) under maker-checker workflow
>
> 4) Validate that if maker checker is enabled for a DOCUMENT APPROVE action
> (new action), a new entry is shown as result of GET to /makerchecker
>
> 5) Approve that pending command and update the flag.
>
> 6) Add the "verified" flag as a new json property to the GET /documents
> response
>
>
>
> This completes our use case requirement. However, I am not comfortable
> with the information shown in the maker-checker tray, as there is no easy
> way to link the document with the parent entity. If I am a checker user on
> mifos, I would be seeing something like this:
>
>
>
>
>
> The document ID is 6, but there is no way to see the related client /
> group / loan / other. which owns the document. I mean, even knowing the
> document ID, it is still not possible to find the actual document and
> verify it before approval. Any ideas about how to improve this?
>
>
>
> Thanks again
>
>
>
> Lionel
>
>
>
> 2016-09-02 10:38 GMT-03:00 Adi Raju <adi.r...@confluxtechnologies.com
> <mailto:adi.r...@confluxtechnologies.com> >:
>
> You can go ahead with the changes and send in the PR.
> This is the right mailing lists for any development or contribution
> related questions.
>
> Regards,
> Adi
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lionel Raymundi - Poincenot [mailto:lio...@poincenot.com <mailto:
> lio...@poincenot.com> ]
> Sent: 02 September 2016 18:55
> To: dev@fineract.incubator.apache.org <mailto:dev@fineract.
> incubator.apache.org>
> Subject: Start work on FINERACT-209
>
> Hi Everybody,
>
> I would like to start working on *FINERACT-209 Maker-Checker principle for
> Document management*.
>
> I am not able to move the task to "in progress". If it is necessary please
> tell me how to do it.
> As this is our first attempt to contribute to the community, we will be
> having some questions about both developing model and (hopefully)
> contribution process. Is this the correct media to ask them?
>
> Thanks
> Lionel
>
>
>
>
