+1 (not conditional on another release) The legal issues are addressed. The community is healthy. That's all we require for graduation.
Ross --- Twitter: @rgardler ________________________________ From: Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 6:42:00 AM To: dev@fineract.incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Fineract Board Report for November Sounds like a plan to me :) > On Oct 30, 2016, at 7:30 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: >> Thx for the report! >> >> I would like to raise the possibility of calling for Graduation >> of Fineract. What does everyone think? > > Personally I think having one more clean release would make me feel > more comfortable about casting a +1 graduation vote. Also, sine I remember > this community wanted to produce binary convenience artifacts at some > point, I'd like to see that happen first. > > All in all: -0. > > Thanks, > Roman.
