Hi all, I"m going to start a couple different threads so we can gather additional feedback and discuss how we can improve on some of the areas of our Apache Fineract evaluation.
In this thread I wanted to discuss backwards compatibility. Criteria for QU40: *The project puts a high priority on backwards compatibility and aims to document any incompatible changes and provide tools and documentation to help users transition to new features.* Sander's Evaluation: Insufficient, while we have structures in place that would support versioning of API's etc this has not been done at all, and as such backwards compatibility is not great, this is also not helped by not clearly stating which breaking changes are part of a given release. Sander, could you elaborate with more specifics so that Nazeer, Adi and others can identify how these concerns can be addressed. Ed -- *Ed Cable* Director of Community Programs, Mifos Initiative edca...@mifos.org | Skype: edcable | Mobile: +1.484.477.8649 *Collectively Creating a World of 3 Billion Maries | *http://mifos.org <http://facebook.com/mifos> <http://www.twitter.com/mifos>
