I'm all for a monorepo. Especially because it's hard to get visibility into a single project when its spread across multiple repos in the sea of the Apache GitHub org.
Are these what the steps look like for moving to a monorepo? 1. Send a do not merge email for all repos 2. Add userale/distill code, git tree, and github actions to the flagon repo 3. Mark userale/distill repos as archived and update read me with a link 4. Send a merge freely email 5. Update flagon readme and flagon site links I don't think there's anything besides the flagon site that points to any github repo, but I'm not sure. On 2024/01/17 00:36:41 Evan Jones wrote: > Hi all, > > I've recently had more bandwidth to contribute to Flagon. Recently, I > helped with the release of Flagon-Distill v0.1.0 and am leading up the > instrumentation team at ARLIS. My goal is for us to ramp up our > contribution to the Flagon suite. > > After spending quite a bit of time thinking about Flagon, I've come to > believe the best way for Flagon to deliver truly differentiated value to > end users is to deliver on the original vision of all the sub-projects: > > - UserALE for instrumentation > - Distill for analytics > - STOUT as a UI for the analytics, metrics, and experiment > - TAP (re-envisioned) as the infrastructure platform to connect all > those pieces > > By eventually building all these pieces, Flagon could be a very strong > open-source alternative to services like Google Analytics, LogRocket, and > others. I intend to socialize the above vision more in the future. For now > I digress since that's not the point of this email. > > The point of this email is to share an RFC > <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xxZDchgjLswbzWpVz0GcRlLqLCEygW_cTvcLhsombtk/edit?usp=sharing> > for *an overhaul I believe needs to happen as a precursor to achieving the > above vision*. > > *Please share feedback, comments and concerns right on the google doc*. > I've also opened a GH issue <https://github.com/apache/flagon/issues/44> if > folks would like to contribute to the conversation there, though I prefer > to keep as much commentary within the document itself to simplify collation > later. > > Many thanks! > > Best > > Evan Jones >