I'm all for a monorepo. Especially because it's hard to get visibility into a 
single project when its spread across multiple repos in the sea of the Apache 
GitHub org.

Are these what the steps look like for moving to a monorepo?

1. Send a do not merge email for all repos
2. Add userale/distill code, git tree, and github actions to the flagon repo
3. Mark userale/distill repos as archived and update read me with a link
4. Send a merge freely email
5. Update flagon readme and flagon site links

I don't think there's anything besides the flagon site that points to any 
github repo, but I'm not sure.

On 2024/01/17 00:36:41 Evan Jones wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I've recently had more bandwidth to contribute to Flagon. Recently, I
> helped with the release of Flagon-Distill v0.1.0 and am leading up the
> instrumentation team at ARLIS. My goal is for us to ramp up our
> contribution to the Flagon suite.
> 
> After spending quite a bit of time thinking about Flagon, I've come to
> believe the best way for Flagon to deliver truly differentiated value to
> end users is to deliver on the original vision of all the sub-projects:
> 
>    - UserALE for instrumentation
>    - Distill for analytics
>    - STOUT as a UI for the analytics, metrics, and experiment
>    - TAP (re-envisioned) as the infrastructure platform to connect all
>    those pieces
> 
> By eventually building all these pieces, Flagon could be a very strong
> open-source alternative to services like Google Analytics, LogRocket, and
> others. I intend to socialize the above vision more in the future. For now
> I digress since that's not the point of this email.
> 
> The point of this email is to share an RFC
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xxZDchgjLswbzWpVz0GcRlLqLCEygW_cTvcLhsombtk/edit?usp=sharing>
> for *an overhaul I believe needs to happen as a precursor to achieving the
> above vision*.
> 
> *Please share feedback, comments and concerns right on the google doc*.
> I've also opened a GH issue <https://github.com/apache/flagon/issues/44> if
> folks would like to contribute to the conversation there, though I prefer
> to keep as much commentary within the document itself to simplify collation
> later.
> 
> Many thanks!
> 
> Best
> 
> Evan Jones
> 

Reply via email to