Quoting Daniel Freeman <madcompone...@gmail.com>:

"I would expect the Open Flex group to put in the development work for this
? not me."...

Let me clarify what I mean.  It is my intention to port MadComponents/MC3D
over to AS"next".  This is quite an undertaking.  Combined with the effort
that I've already put into the framework, and the new GPU-enabled effects.

To turn this into a Flex framework - all you'd need to do is write Flex
wrappers.  Along the lines of the examples that I demoed in 2011, but
writing them in such a way as to maintain the familiar conventions of Flex
in mxml.  Also, tweaks to the MD3D classes to allow them to work within
Flex.  But most of the hard work will be already done.  So this is a little
more than free consultancy (although that in itself would have been
generous).


This is my point, the consultancy thing was a joke. I understand you believe in your framework and you're abilities, but your tone IMHO needs a little work.

I am by no means speaking for any body but myself here but, what you are saying doesn't seem to fit how opensource code has been "donated" to projects that I have seen in the past. Are you offering the source code to Apache? Or only parts? Or ideas?

It is unclear to me what you are actually being generous of.

You say write Flex wrappers, so that means we are dependent on external code (that you own)?

Mike


--
Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC
http://www.teotigraphix.com
http://blog.teotigraphix.com

Reply via email to