I agree with Carol on all points. It would be a loss of time Fréderic Cox
On 22/01/13 15:48, "Carol Frampton" <cfram...@adobe.com> wrote: > > >On 1/21/13 6 :09PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>> BlazeDS is being donated by a different team and I checked earlier in >>> January and they said they have to clear up a legal issue. I don't >>>have any >>> details and haven't pressed them for it. >>Mind asking what the legal issue is? >> >>> 3.x could be a lot of work and nobody has asked for it recently, >>It just come up (indirectly) in a JIRA issue. >>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-14658 >> >>> There might be slightly easier ways to make it happen >>Most of us are external and only have a general idea to is required for >>this to happen inside Adobe at this point I think any "shortcuts" are >>worth investigating. > >Personally I think it is a much better use of Alex's time to continue to >work on the the JS stuff rather than divert him for potentially a couple >of months getting 3.x ready for donation. If Flex was still at Adobe, >since Flex 4 has been out for so long now I would guess Flex 3 would be at >or near end-of-life. > >Even if it got to Apache it would mean that it would have to be >periodically released which is just as big an undertaking as the current >version. I think it would be a better use of our resources to concentrate >on releasing Flex 4.next more often. > >Carol > >
