Igor wrote: >This isn't the right spot to start working a major release with flag Apache >Flex 5 >We need to focus on the following things before: > - Fix the current open-bugs > - Adapt the Falcon to the SDK > - Integrate other dependencies from Adobe donations like Squiggly and TLF. >Than on the begin release of Apache Flex 5 we can add the support of output >for HTML/JS.
Fred wrote: >I thought it was much more plan to do a 4.10 instead of a 5.0 until >UIComponent/Styles has been reviewed (rewrited). I agree with Igor. I think we are currently working on Apache Flex 4.10 & 4.11, & 4.12, ... etc. The Apache Flex 5 designation should be reserved until a group consensus forms around one of the HTML/JS approaches being worked on by some of the very creative & ambitious members of this project. Although a huge task, I don't think that refactoring UIComponent is a "5". When / if the project can say: we removed the "Flash dependency", then we should name the version "5".
