To be more precise, I would like to let the code as it is for the Adobe SDKs
and assign the SDK version to the rsls for the Apache SDKs, would it be a
problem ?
-Fred
-----Message d'origine-----
From: Frédéric THOMAS
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 3:14 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: Splitting up Flex and Air?
Hi Chris,
I was happy trying that but it doesn't work, the current implementation
which process rsls, getting the version number of the artifact extracting it
from the original rls file is based on the assumption that Textlayout and
OMSF can have a different version number than the SDK and make it a
generality for all the rsls, which doesn't fit for my attemp.
Even if this assumption is true for the SDK < 4.8, it's apparently not true
for SDK >= 4.8, could we hardcode this as an exception for these 2 libs and
assign the SDK version number for the others ?
-Fred
-----Message d'origine-----
From: christofer.d...@c-ware.de
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 11:42 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: AW: AW: AW: Splitting up Flex and Air?
Sure I'm fine with that :-)
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Frédéric THOMAS [mailto:webdoubl...@hotmail.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 31. Januar 2013 11:03
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: Splitting up Flex and Air?
Ok, I don't need to change the AIR version, should work then, anyway, maybe
add a step-by-step help in the readme for the last part as I didn't get
everything :)
Still, do you mind if in the SDKGenerator, I replace :
// In general the version consists of the content of the version element
with an appended build-number.
String sdkVersion = version + "." + build;
by:
// In general the version consists of the content of the version element
with an appended build-number.
String sdkVersion = (build.equals("0")) ? version + "-SNAPSHOT"
: version + "." + build;
The build number will be set to 0 only if I do a temporary release from the
sources, never in official releases.
-Fred
-----Message d'origine-----
From: christofer.d...@c-ware.de
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 10:36 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: AW: AW: Splitting up Flex and Air?
Hi Frederic,
well as far as I know, as long as you use the Air version that was naturally
bundled with the corresponding FDK, then all should work already. The only
problem is that if you want to use a different Air SDK. Currently the adt of
the original FDK is used, but it should be the version shipped with the
desired Air SDK version. That's what I'm intending on doing. The only change
you should need to use that updated version with FM would be that you need
to add a "compiler" artifact for the Flex-SDK as well as one additional
Air-SDK compiler artifact.
Chris
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Frédéric THOMAS [mailto:webdoubl...@hotmail.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 31. Januar 2013 10:28
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: Splitting up Flex and Air?
Hi Chris,
I'm doing an AIR App, so let me know when you update FM pls, like that I can
test it, btw, do you mind if I update the mavenizer as when the Flex build
number is 0, instead of having a version number + '.0', I put version number
+ "-SNAPSHOT" ?
-Fred
-----Message d'origine-----
From: christofer.d...@c-ware.de
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 8:44 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: AW: Splitting up Flex and Air?
Hi Om,
Well I think this would definitely be a cool thing. Then the user will have
several ways of getting a mavenized FDK (Intaller, Manually Mavenizing,
Mavenizer integrated into the maven-flex-plugin and by using the
auto-download-feature of the maven-flex-plugin (the one I was talking to
Alex about)).
But before officially adding this, I'd like to modify the mavenizer to
correctly mavenize the Air compiler artifacts (adt.jar, smaili.jar and
baksmali.jar)
Chris
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: omup...@gmail.com [mailto:omup...@gmail.com] Im Auftrag von Om
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 31. Januar 2013 02:35
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Splitting up Flex and Air?
Chris, I meant to reply earlier, but forgot.
The installer already downloads everything while displaying the required
licenses along the way. Do you think having a "Mavenize" button at the end
would be a good idea? We could just call your mavenize ant script from the
AIR app. Please let me know if this is something you would be interested.
I would be glad to help you out with this.
Thanks,
Om
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 9:20 AM, christofer.d...@c-ware.de <
christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote:
Hey ... I was never talking about distributing them ... The mavenizer
is all about you downloading (after Accepting whatever license Adobe
wants you to accept). And then simply to transform this download on
your local machine. So every user that wants to use it has to mavenize
a FDK before using it.
The tool I promised to create (as soon as I have the time to do so)
will take care of the downloading but at this point the Mavenizer
expects you to download the stuff manually and this code will be the
base for the tool I am intending on building ... but I don't want to
go into a discussion about this again.
Currently I'll simply stick to mavenizing every jar in the Air SDK
into the groupId "com.adobe.air.compiler" and hard-code an exception
to omit the
3 files from "com.adobe.flex.compiler" or "org.apache.flex.compiler".
I think this should do the trick.
Chris
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 28. Januar 2013 18:02
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Splitting up Flex and Air?
On 1/28/13 12:25 AM, "christofer.d...@c-ware.de" <
christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> a while ago a user complained that in my Mavenizer I was deploying
> the Air jars in {fdk-root}/lib to the group
> org.apache.flex.compiler/com.adobe.flex.compiler ... ths is indeed
> not quite correct and I would like to fix this.
>
> All Air sdks except 2.6 contain only adt.jar so I think I'm on the
> safe side, but 2.6 has more libs "baksmali.jar", "smali.jar". So
> would it be safe to hard-code these three jars and to place them in
> "com.adobe.air.compiler", or would this have negative side-effects?
>
I don't know what those jars do. If they come from the Adobe AIR SDK
download then unless you have a redistribution agreement with Adobe,
it is technically not allowed for these jars to be in FlexMojos
distribution.
That's why in the Apache Flex Maven utilities you promised to write
that download utility that requires the user accept the license and
then get the stuff from Adobe.
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
