oh my bad i read overwriting. Sorry :)
2013/2/3 Alain Ekambi <jazzmatad...@gmail.com> > @Avi Kessner > > polymorphism ? > > > 2013/2/3 Avi Kessner <akess...@gmail.com> > >> I can not for the life of me understand the desire for overloading >> functions. If it has different behavior give it a different name. >> >> brought to you by the letters A, V, and I >> and the number 47 >> >> >> On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Roland Zwaga <rol...@stackandheap.com >> >wrote: >> >> > +100.000 for generics (although I fully understand that this is probably >> > one of the most difficult features to implement) >> > >> > +1 for lamba expressions >> > >> > On 3 February 2013 12:48, christofer.d...@c-ware.de < >> > christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: >> > >> > > +1 for method overloading from me too >> > > >> > > And: >> > > >> > > +1 for private/protected constructors :-) >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> > > Von: Frédéric THOMAS [mailto:webdoubl...@hotmail.com] >> > > Gesendet: Sonntag, 3. Februar 2013 05:16 >> > > An: dev@flex.apache.org >> > > Betreff: Re: Language features >> > > >> > > Nick, +1 or even 10 >> > > >> > > -Fred >> > > >> > > -----Message d'origine----- >> > > From: Nicholas Kwiatkowski >> > > Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2013 6:58 PM >> > > To: dev@flex.apache.org >> > > Subject: Re: Language features >> > > >> > > I'd be fairly excited to see method overloading. It's one of the >> things I >> > > miss from Java... >> > > >> > > -Nick >> > > >> > > On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Avi Kessner <akess...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > > >> > > > If it was up to me, I would vote against method overloading. I >> think >> > > > that's a code smell personally. >> > > > >> > > > brought to you by the letters A, V, and I and the number 47 >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Frédéric THOMAS < >> > webdoubl...@hotmail.com >> > > > >wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > Hi Gordon, >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > Adding abstract classes and private constructors to Falcon >> should be >> > > > easy >> > > > >> >> > > > > >> > > > > That's a good news, at this point protected constructor would be >> > > > > welcomed >> > > > > as well as private constructors are commonly used in classes that >> > > > > contain >> > > > > static members only. >> > > > > >> > > > > And I voting +1 for the rest :-) you gonna make happy a lot of >> people >> > > > > who >> > > > > wait for a long time for these features. >> > > > > >> > > > > -Fred >> > > > > >> > > > > -----Message d'origine----- From: Gordon Smith >> > > > > Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 7:38 PM >> > > > > To: dev@flex.apache.org >> > > > > Subject: RE: Language features >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > Adding abstract classes and private constructors to Falcon should >> be >> > > > easy. >> > > > > Adding generics and method overloading would be considerably >> harder >> > but >> > > > > probably doable after a lot of design. Two other features worth >> > > > considering >> > > > > are strong function types (i.e., a type like (int, int):String >> for a >> > > > > function that takes two ints and returns a String) and >> strongly-typed >> > > > fixed >> > > > > arrays (i.e., int[]). >> > > > > >> > > > > I'm going to continue to focus on MXML. Until it is finished, we >> > can't >> > > > > move from the old compiler to the new one. I don't recommend >> making >> > any >> > > > > modifications to the old compiler. >> > > > > >> > > > > - Gordon >> > > > > >> > > > > -----Original Message----- >> > > > > From: Frédéric THOMAS [mailto:webdoublefx@hotmail.**com< >> > > > webdoubl...@hotmail.com> >> > > > > ] >> > > > > Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 3:07 AM >> > > > > To: dev@flex.apache.org >> > > > > Subject: Re: Language features >> > > > > >> > > > > +1 Nick >> > > > > >> > > > > May be possible, I don't know, time ago, I looked at adding the >> > > > > possibility to have the constructor accepting other NS than >> public to >> > > > > simulate abstract classes and seen 2 places where it was checked >> but >> > > > didn't >> > > > > dare to change it besause I didn't know the impacts, I hope >> someone >> > > > better >> > > > > than me here can take care of it, compiler geeks, are you here ? >> > > > > >> > > > > -Fred >> > > > > >> > > > > -----Message d'origine----- >> > > > > From: Nick Collins >> > > > > Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 11:24 AM >> > > > > To: dev@flex.apache.org >> > > > > Subject: Language features >> > > > > >> > > > > With the cancellation of AVM next, should we perhaps look at >> adding >> > > some >> > > > > additional language features to our compiler? >> > > > > >> > > > > As I think about some of the features I would like to see, such as >> > > > > abstract classes, generics, method overloading, etc. it seems to >> me >> > > that >> > > > at >> > > > > least some of them could be implemented into our compiler? >> > > > > >> > > > > Nick >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > regards, >> > Roland >> > >> > -- >> > Roland Zwaga >> > Senior Consultant | Stack & Heap BVBA >> > >> > +32 (0)486 16 12 62 | rol...@stackandheap.com | >> > http://www.stackandheap.com >> > >> > http://zwaga.blogspot.com >> > http://www.springactionscript.org >> > http://www.as3commons.org >> > >> > >
